United Kingdom16 days leftOpen

Bar End Sports Stadium Athletics Track Repairs

Tender Overview

LOCATION

South East England, United Kingdom

VALUE

£120,000

DEADLINE

February 18, 2026 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

45000000

REFERENCE

001515-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

The University of Winchester invites contractors to submit a tender response for works associated with repairing a section of our athletics track. Full details can be found at: https://in-tendhost.co.uk/winchester/aspx/Login Return Date: 12 Noon 18th February 2026.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided tender information.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Be a contractor capable of undertaking construction work (CPV Category: Construction work).
  • Be able to repair a section of an athletics track.
  • Be able to operate within an Open procurement type framework.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Possess the capability to perform repairs on an athletics track.
  • Ability to complete the contract works within a duration of 1 month.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Be able to bid for a contract with an estimated value of 120,000 EUR (or £120,000).
  • Offer a competitive price, as price accounts for 70% of the evaluation criteria.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit a tender response for the athletics track repairs.
  • Submit the tender response electronically via the University of Winchester's e-tendering portal: https://in-tendhost.co.uk/winchester/aspx/Login.
  • Ensure the tender response is submitted by the deadline of 12 Noon on 18th February 2026.
  • Provide information that allows for evaluation based on price (70%) and quality (30%).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

PDF
Official PDF Version
PDF001515-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
The University of Winchester invites contractors to tender for athletics track repairs, an open competition valued at £120,000, with submissions due by 18th February 2026, evaluated 70% on price and 30% on quality.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

67
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender suffers from a critical lack of comprehensive documentation, making a thorough assessment challenging and hindering fair competition. Key details regarding evaluation criteria and legal compliance are notably absent.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

Legal compliance is significantly compromised by the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, which are fundamental to public procurement. The lack of full tender documents also prevents a complete assessment of adherence to regulations.

No mandatory exclusion grounds detailed
Inability to fully assess compliance due to missing tender documents
Clarity40/100

Clarity is poor due to vague technical requirements, a discrepancy in the stated currency for the estimated value, and the complete absence of detailed criteria for the 30% quality evaluation.

Vague technical capability requirements ('Possess the capability')
Currency discrepancy for estimated value (EUR vs £)
Completeness83/100

The tender is critically incomplete, as no actual tender documents are attached or accessible, meaning essential information like full specifications, terms, and conditions is missing. Mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed quality evaluation criteria are also absent.

No tender documents attached or accessible
Missing detailed quality evaluation criteria
Fairness60/100

Fairness is severely impacted by the absence of detailed quality evaluation criteria, which introduces subjectivity into the assessment. The very short contract duration (1 month) and vague technical requirements could also unfairly limit the pool of eligible bidders.

Missing detailed quality evaluation criteria leading to subjective assessment
Potentially restrictive short contract duration (1 month)
Practicality40/100

The practicality for bidders is low due to the complete lack of tender documents, making it impossible to understand the full scope and prepare a proper response. The 1-month contract duration for repairs also appears very challenging.

Impossibility for bidders to prepare due to missing tender documents
Very short contract duration (1 month) for construction repairs
Data Consistency100/100

A notable inconsistency exists in the financial information, where the estimated value is stated as '120,000.00 EUR (or £120,000)', requiring clarification.

Inconsistent currency stated for estimated value (EUR vs £)
Sustainability0/100

No specific sustainability (green or social) criteria or considerations are mentioned in the provided information.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference number, and procuring organization.
Estimated value and CPV code are provided.
Evaluation criteria weighting (70% price, 30% quality) is specified.
Electronic submission via a dedicated portal is indicated.

Concerns

Critical absence of comprehensive tender documents, hindering bidder understanding and participation.
Lack of detailed evaluation criteria for the 30% quality component, compromising fairness and objectivity.
Failure to specify mandatory exclusion grounds, a fundamental legal requirement.
Vague technical capability requirements, lacking measurable specifics.
Very short contract duration of 1 month, potentially limiting competition.

Recommendations

1. Immediately publish all comprehensive tender documents, including full specifications, terms, and conditions.
2. Clearly define and publish detailed, objective evaluation criteria for the 30% quality component.
3. Explicitly state all mandatory exclusion grounds in accordance with applicable procurement regulations.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
67/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes