Legal Compliance100/100
The tender explicitly states compliance with the Procurement Act 2023 for Light Touch Contracts and mentions mandatory exclusion grounds, indicating an intention to adhere to relevant legal frameworks. A comprehensive assessment is hindered by the lack of full tender documents.
Clarity40/100
The description provides a clear overview of the framework's purpose, structure (tiers), target groups, and duration. However, the absence of detailed tender documents means specific requirements, evaluation criteria, and contractual terms are not clear.
•Lack of detailed tender documents (e.g., specification, ITT, contract terms).
•Absence of explicit evaluation criteria.
Completeness83/100
The provided information offers a high-level overview of the framework. However, it is severely incomplete for a full tender process due to the explicit statement 'DOCUMENTS (0 total)' and 'No document content available'. Essential elements like detailed specifications, evaluation criteria, submission instructions, and contract terms are missing.
•No tender documents available (e.g., Invitation to Tender, full specification, draft contract).
•Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Fairness60/100
The tiered structure and the ability to bid for one or more tiers, along with the intention to reopen opportunities, suggest an attempt to promote participation. However, the lack of detailed evaluation criteria and specific financial requirements could lead to subjective assessment or disadvantage smaller providers. Broad eligibility and technical requirements, without specific metrics, also risk inconsistent application.
•Absence of explicit evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessment.
•Vague financial requirements ('implicitly expected') could disadvantage bidders without clear guidance.
Practicality40/100
The framework approach for social services is practical for managing ongoing demand and multiple providers. However, the critical lack of detailed documentation makes it impractical for bidders to prepare a comprehensive and compliant submission. The absence of a predetermined schedule for reopening opportunities might make long-term planning difficult for potential new entrants.
•Bidders cannot practically prepare a robust offer without access to full tender documents, detailed specifications, and evaluation criteria.
•The lack of a predetermined schedule for reopening opportunities might hinder strategic planning for new market entrants.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided data is internally consistent. The estimated value aligns with the 7-year term mentioned, and the description of tiers matches the requirements.
Sustainability25/100
The tender mentions 'Social Criteria' under procurement characteristics, indicating an intention to incorporate social value. However, without the full tender documents, the specific nature and extent of these criteria, and how they will be evaluated, remain unclear. No explicit mention of environmental or economic sustainability aspects is provided.
•Lack of specific details on the 'Social Criteria' and how they will be evaluated.
•No explicit mention of environmental or economic sustainability aspects.