Maintenance and repair of garden machinery

This tender provides clear basic information but suffers from significant transparency and fairness issues due to restricted document access and the reported absence of evaluation criteria.

While the procedure type is clear, the CPV code is appropriate, and the submission deadline is reasonable, the 'Restricted document access' and the 'Missing evaluation criteria' (as flagged by automated checks) represent significant legal compliance deficiencies regarding transparency and fair competition.

The general description of services is clear, and AI-extracted requirements provide a structured overview. However, the reported 'Missing evaluation criteria' and 'Restricted document access' severely diminish the clarity of detailed requirements and the basis for offer evaluation.

Basic information such as title, organization, value, and duration is complete. However, the 'Restricted document access' and the 'Missing evaluation criteria' are critical gaps, and one document summary failed, indicating incomplete processing or accessibility.

The tender value is disclosed, and the submission deadline is reasonable. However, 'Restricted document access' and 'Missing evaluation criteria' fundamentally undermine fairness and transparency. The contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' flag also raises concerns about equal access.

The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the contradiction regarding e-submission, the lack of an explicit document URL, and the 'Restricted document access' significantly reduce the practicality for potential bidders to prepare and submit offers efficiently.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is an inconsistency in the NUTS code (LV009 for Bauska, which is LV006), a contradiction regarding e-procurement/e-submission, and conflicting information about the presence of evaluation criteria.

The tender does not indicate any focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, nor is it EU funded, suggesting a lack of integration of sustainability considerations.