CBC-1889-T-TS Sundon Landfill - Maintenance of Closed Landfill Sites - 2 Lots

This tender provides clear submission instructions and basic information but suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria and detailed bidder requirements, significantly impacting clarity, completeness, and fairness. It also lacks any sustainability considerations.

The tender correctly identifies the procedure type (Open) and CPV code, and deadlines appear reasonable. However, the AI-extracted information explicitly notes the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, technical capability, and financial requirements, which are standard components of compliant tender documentation.

Submission instructions are clear and well-articulated, including the use of the In-tend portal and communication protocols. However, the tender explicitly lacks specified evaluation criteria, and the AI-extracted requirements indicate no explicit technical capability or financial requirements, significantly hindering bidders' understanding of what is truly needed and how their offers will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location is complete. Documents are listed as available. Nevertheless, the critical absence of explicit evaluation criteria and detailed mandatory exclusion, technical, and financial requirements (as per AI extraction) renders the tender incomplete for comprehensive bidder preparation.

The tender promotes fairness through disclosed value, reasonable submission period, and mandatory use of an e-procurement portal for all communications. However, the explicit absence of evaluation criteria is a significant concern, as it compromises transparency and objectivity, making it difficult for bidders to understand the basis of award and potentially favoring those with internal knowledge.

The tender supports electronic submission via a dedicated portal and provides clear contract start and duration dates. While these aspects are practical, the lack of explicit technical, financial, and evaluation criteria makes it highly impractical for potential bidders to prepare a well-informed and competitive submission.

Key fields are consistently populated, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates for submission and contract commencement are logical and align. A minor inconsistency exists between 'Contract Duration: 36 months' and 'Contract term: Please refer to the tender documents,' but the 36-month duration is clearly stated.

The tender does not include any explicit green procurement, social, or innovation aspects. There is no indication of EU funding, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards. This represents a significant missed opportunity for incorporating modern procurement best practices.