Framework Agreement C14 Lighting Installation Works up to 1,000,000 GBP in Value

This tender demonstrates good foundational elements with clear work descriptions and timelines, but is significantly hampered by the critical absence of evaluation criteria and a limited focus on broader sustainability aspects.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and there are no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable from the current date. However, the actual tender reveal date is missing from the provided summary, which is a minor compliance gap.

The description of the works is clear and unambiguous. Some technical and submission requirements are well-defined. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major clarity issue, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be judged.

Basic information, financial details, duration, and key timelines are all specified. Documents are listed and summarized. However, the tender summary lacks specific eligibility and financial requirements, and critically, evaluation criteria are not defined, indicating significant gaps in completeness.

Full document access is implied, the value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic. However, the absence of evaluation criteria severely impacts the objectivity and transparency of the process, raising fairness concerns. There is also a contradiction regarding e-submission between characteristics and automated checks.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. While 'E-Procurement' is listed, the automated check indicates 'No e-submission', creating ambiguity regarding practical submission methods. An explicit document URL is not provided in the summary.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. Minor inconsistencies include missing codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure', and an empty 'Liable Person' field.

The tender includes a positive social aspect by requiring bidders to address community benefits. However, it explicitly lacks focus on green procurement or innovation, and is not EU funded, limiting its overall sustainability score.