Legal Compliance100/100
Basic legal compliance appears to be in place regarding the open procedure and general structure. However, the explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided text is a significant concern, as these are fundamental for ensuring legal eligibility.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summary.
Clarity40/100
The description of the service, contract objective, and lot structure is very clear and well-defined. Technical requirements for operator qualifications are also clearly stated, providing good guidance for potential tenderers.
Completeness83/100
The provided summary is incomplete as it lacks crucial sections such as detailed financial requirements, comprehensive evaluation criteria, and the full set of mandatory exclusion grounds. The absence of attached documents in the input further limits a complete assessment.
•Missing explicit financial requirements (e.g., turnover, insurance).
•Missing explicit evaluation criteria.
Fairness60/100
The open procedure and division into 8 lots promote fairness and accessibility for a wider range of bidders, including Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and financial requirements in the summary raises concerns about transparency and equal treatment if these are not clearly defined in the full documents. There is no indication of requirements being tailored for a specific company.
•Missing explicit evaluation criteria, which are essential for transparent and fair assessment.
•Missing explicit financial requirements, which could impact fair assessment of financial standing.
Practicality40/100
The division of the contract into 8 distinct lots is a practical approach for managing a large geographical area and encourages participation from local contractors. The technical requirements for operator certification are relevant and practical for the nature of the service.
Data Consistency100/100
The information provided within the tender summary is consistent and coherent.
Sustainability0/100
No specific green procurement, social, or innovation criteria are explicitly mentioned in the provided text. This represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives and achieve additional public value.
•Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.