Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines an Open procedure and assigns appropriate CPV codes. The submission deadline provides a reasonable preparation period from today's date. However, the absence of a specific reveal date in the provided data prevents full verification of the minimum publication period.
•Missing reveal date in the provided data
Clarity55/100
The tender description is highly detailed and provides excellent context for the required legal services. AI-extracted eligibility and technical requirements are clear and specific. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders bidders' understanding of how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness60/100
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and CPV/NUTS codes are well-populated. Documents are listed as available. Nevertheless, the crucial omission of evaluation criteria renders the tender incomplete regarding the award process.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness50/100
The tender discloses the estimated value and supports e-procurement, promoting equal access. Requirements appear specialized but not overtly tailored. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria creates a significant transparency deficit, making it difficult for bidders to prepare competitive and relevant proposals, thus compromising fairness.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100
The tender supports e-procurement, which is a positive for accessibility. However, the absence of a direct document URL in the basic information is a practical inconvenience. The contract start date is not explicitly stated, only the duration.
•No direct document URL provided in basic information
Data Consistency80/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field and a contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and an automated flag of 'No e-submission'.
•Empty 'Liable Person' field
•Contradiction regarding e-submission
Sustainability20/100
The tender does not include any explicit criteria or mentions related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
•No sustainability, social, or innovation criteria