Outsourced Technical Services - Tender Support

This tender for outsourced technical services support demonstrates good basic information but suffers from significant deficiencies in clarity and completeness regarding evaluation criteria, and lacks modern e-procurement features and sustainability considerations.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code correctly, and there are no reported disputes. However, the critical absence of specific evaluation criteria for a 100% quality-based assessment represents a significant compliance gap regarding transparency and fair competition. The reveal date is also missing.

While the overall description and categorized requirements are clear, the tender critically lacks specific evaluation criteria for how 'quality' will be assessed, despite stating evaluation is 100% based on quality. This ambiguity makes it difficult for bidders to understand the contracting authority's expectations.

Most basic information, financial details, and timeline elements are present. However, the absence of detailed evaluation criteria for a quality-based tender is a significant omission, making the tender documentation incomplete for comprehensive bid preparation. Details on 'Divided into Parts' are also missing.

The tender's fairness is significantly compromised by the lack of objective and transparent evaluation criteria, which introduces subjectivity into the assessment process. The absence of e-submission capabilities also creates barriers to equal access for all potential bidders.

The tender's practicality is hindered by the absence of electronic submission, which is a standard expectation in modern procurement. The lack of an explicit document URL also makes it less convenient for potential bidders to access the full tender package.

Data consistency is generally good with logical dates and no reported disputes. However, minor fields such as 'Liable Person' and specific codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure' are unpopulated. There's also a minor currency discrepancy between the EUR value and GBP mentioned in summaries.

The tender shows a complete absence of sustainability considerations, including green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to align with modern public procurement best practices.