Southwark Recovery Space

This tender for a Southwark Recovery Space is generally well-structured with clear service requirements and financial details, but it suffers from a lack of detailed evaluation criteria and the absence of electronic submission, impacting fairness and clarity.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV code appropriately, and there are no disputes. However, the reveal date is missing, and while high-level evaluation criteria (60% quality, 40% price) are stated, the detailed sub-criteria are not, which is a disclosure gap impacting full compliance.

The service description and basic requirements are clear and unambiguous. However, the absence of detailed evaluation sub-criteria significantly reduces clarity for potential bidders on how their proposals will be precisely assessed.

Most essential information such as title, organization, value, duration, and location is provided. However, the tender lacks detailed evaluation criteria, and some administrative fields like procedure codes and liable person are empty, indicating minor completeness gaps.

The tender value is disclosed, and requirements appear generic, not tailored. The approximate two-month submission period is generally reasonable. However, the absence of detailed evaluation criteria limits transparency and objectivity, and the lack of e-submission creates a barrier to equal access for all potential bidders.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the significant drawback is the lack of electronic submission support, which is a major practical hurdle in modern procurement processes. A document URL is not explicitly provided.

Dates are logical and consistent, and there are no disputes. However, there is a minor inconsistency between the estimated value stated in EUR (900,000) and the GBP equivalent (£750,000) mentioned in document summaries, which do not precisely align at typical exchange rates. Some codes and fields are also unpopulated.

While the service itself (community-based crisis diversion) inherently addresses social needs, the tender documentation does not explicitly include green procurement, broader social clauses for suppliers, or innovation-focused criteria, indicating a missed opportunity for a more comprehensive sustainability approach in the procurement process.