Legal Compliance75/100
The tender defines the procedure type as 'Open' and assigns a relevant CPV code. The submission deadline provides a reasonable timeframe from today's date, mitigating the concern about a missing reveal date. However, the AI summary indicates no explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, which, if not detailed in the full documents, could be a minor compliance gap.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided summary.
Clarity60/100
The description of services, division into lots, and technical specifications (e.g., timber dimensions, G50/W30, certifications) are clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces the clarity for potential bidders on how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness65/100
The tender includes essential information such as title, reference, organization, financial details, timeline, and classification. Requirements and documents are listed. However, the crucial omission of evaluation criteria makes the tender incomplete from a bidder's perspective.
•Missing evaluation criteria.
Fairness55/100
The tender discloses the estimated value and divides the procurement into lots, allowing for broader participation. Requirements appear generic and industry-standard, not tailored to a specific company. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria severely compromises the objectivity and transparency of the process, making it difficult for bidders to compete fairly.
•No evaluation criteria specified, impacting objectivity and transparency.
Practicality60/100
The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, and financing information is available. A significant practical drawback is the lack of electronic submission, which is a standard expectation in modern procurement processes. Document URLs are not explicitly provided in the summary.
•No electronic submission supported.
•Document URLs not explicitly provided.
Data Consistency90/100
All key fields are populated, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates are logical and consistent with the specified contract duration. The description is consistent across the various sections and document summaries.
Sustainability50/100
The tender includes elements related to sustainability by requiring compliance with Renewable Heat Incentive (RHI) obligations and Biomass Suppliers List (BSL) certification for woodchip, and encourages sourcing timber within a 60-mile radius. However, it is not explicitly framed as a comprehensive 'green procurement' and lacks broader social or innovation criteria.
•Not explicitly framed as a comprehensive 'green procurement'.
•No explicit social or innovation criteria beyond basic sustainability certifications.