Legal Compliance100/100
The use of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) under the Restricted Procedure, with the caveat of no limit to qualified tenderers, aligns with public procurement regulations. The mention of mandatory exclusion grounds, even if not detailed in the extract, indicates awareness of legal requirements. No specific legal non-compliance is evident from the provided text.
Clarity40/100
The tender's description of the DPS, its purpose, categories, and required vehicle types is clear and well-structured. The eligibility and technical capability requirements, as extracted, are also generally understandable. However, the overall clarity for a potential bidder is severely hampered by the absence of the full tender documentation.
Completeness83/100
This is the most significant area of concern. The tender information provided is highly incomplete due to the explicit statement 'DOCUMENTS (0 total)' and 'No document content available'. Crucial elements such as the full Contract Notice, detailed selection criteria, award criteria, terms and conditions, and specific mandatory exclusion grounds are missing, making a full assessment impossible.
•Critical absence of full tender documents.
•Missing detailed selection criteria.
Fairness80/100
The DPS structure inherently promotes fairness by allowing new suppliers to join at any time and by stating 'no limit to the number of tenderers who qualify'. The categorization of services appears reasonable, allowing specialized providers to participate. Without the full selection and award criteria, however, a complete assessment of fairness in the evaluation process cannot be made.
Practicality40/100
The implementation of a DPS is highly practical for procuring ongoing, diverse transport services, allowing the contracting authority to adapt to market changes and new entrants. The categorization of services (e.g., wheelchair accessible, escorts, ad hoc) is practical for matching specific needs with supplier capabilities. The system being 'completely electronic' further enhances practicality.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided information is internally consistent. The DPS duration (2021-2027) aligns with the contract duration (72 months), and the description of services matches the defined categories and vehicle types. No contradictions were found within the extracted data.
Sustainability25/100
The tender explicitly lists 'Social Criteria' under procurement characteristics, which is a positive indicator for incorporating social sustainability aspects. However, no specific details on these criteria are provided, nor are there any explicit environmental sustainability requirements mentioned in the extract.
•Lack of specific details regarding the 'Social Criteria'.
•Absence of explicit environmental sustainability requirements.