Legal Compliance100/100
The tender information provided is significantly deficient in terms of legal compliance. The complete absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, and financial requirements is a fundamental breach of procurement regulations. Furthermore, the stated 'Restricted procedure' is inconsistent with the nature of a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS), which is an open procedure for admission.
•Absence of mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Absence of eligibility requirements.
Clarity40/100
While the general description of the services and products required is clear, the tender's clarity is severely undermined by the complete lack of detailed requirements and supporting documents. The process for admission to the DPS, including how bids/quotes/tenders will be evaluated, remains entirely unclear.
•Lack of detailed requirements for admission to the DPS.
•No information on how bids, quotes, or tenders will be evaluated.
Completeness83/100
The tender is critically incomplete. Essential components such as mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility criteria, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are entirely missing. The absence of any attached tender documents is a fundamental flaw that prevents a proper understanding of the procurement.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Missing eligibility requirements.
Fairness80/100
The complete lack of clear, detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, financial standing, and especially evaluation criteria makes it impossible to assess the fairness of this procurement process. Without these, the process is opaque, highly susceptible to subjective assessment, and carries a significant risk of being perceived as unfair or potentially tailored to specific suppliers.
•Absence of clear evaluation criteria for admission to the DPS.
•Lack of detailed requirements creates an opaque and potentially unfair process.
Practicality40/100
The concept of using a DPS for a wide range of recurring products and services is practical for the contracting authority. However, the current tender information is highly impractical for potential bidders, as it lacks the necessary detail to prepare a compliant, competitive, and informed submission.
•Bidders cannot prepare adequate submissions without detailed tender documents.
•The process for admission to the DPS is unclear, hindering practical application.
Data Consistency100/100
There is a significant inconsistency between the stated 'Restricted procedure' and the intention to establish a 'Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS)'. A DPS is inherently an open procedure for the admission of economic operators, not a restricted one.
•Conflict between the stated 'Restricted procedure' and the nature of a 'Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS)'.
Sustainability0/100
No information is provided regarding environmental, social, or innovation criteria within the tender. This indicates a missed opportunity to integrate sustainability objectives into the procurement process.
•No mention of green procurement criteria.
•No social criteria specified.