Whole Family Support Framework (Re-Opening#2 Jan26)

This tender for a Whole Family Support Framework demonstrates a clear purpose but suffers from significant omissions in critical areas, particularly regarding financial transparency and evaluation methodology.

The tender utilizes an Open procedure, which is generally compliant. However, the absence of explicitly detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and, most critically, the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria are significant legal compliance concerns that undermine transparency and equal treatment.

The overall purpose and scope of services (Children & Young People’s Mental Health & Wellbeing, Specialist & Therapeutic Support) are clearly articulated. However, the technical capability requirements are high-level, lacking specific guidance on how capabilities are to be demonstrated, which could lead to ambiguity for bidders.

The tender is incomplete in several key aspects. The estimated value is not disclosed, detailed financial requirements are missing, and there is a critical absence of evaluation criteria. This makes it difficult for potential bidders to understand the full scope and assessment process.

The lack of explicit evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as it prevents bidders from understanding how their submissions will be assessed and compared. While the re-opening for 'new providers only' aims to expand the framework, it requires careful management to ensure equal opportunity and transparent integration with existing framework members.

The service requirements themselves appear practical and aligned with the stated objectives. However, the lack of detailed guidance on demonstrating technical capabilities could pose practical challenges for bidders in preparing comprehensive and relevant submissions.

Based on the provided summaries, there are no apparent inconsistencies in the data. The OCDS documents align with the tender notice regarding the framework's purpose and re-opening.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social, or innovation criteria. This represents a missed opportunity to leverage public procurement for broader sustainability objectives, especially for a framework focused on community support.