C3770 Framework for Construction Related Consultancy

Overall, the tender documentation is clear and detailed in its description, but it suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria and an illogical contract start date, impacting fairness and practicality.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately, and no disputes are noted. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant legal compliance issue, as is the lack of procedure codes.

The framework's description, objectives, and requirements are clearly articulated. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly diminishes overall clarity for potential bidders.

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are provided, and essential documents are available. Nevertheless, the fundamental lack of specified evaluation criteria represents a major gap in completeness.

While requirements appear generic and not tailored, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises the fairness and transparency of the procurement process. The lack of e-submission also limits equal access.

The tender lacks electronic submission capabilities, which is a significant practical drawback. Furthermore, the contract start date being identical to the submission deadline is highly impractical and illogical, indicating a procedural flaw.

There are minor inconsistencies such as missing procedure codes and a slight discrepancy between the estimated value in EUR and GBP. Critically, the contract start date is illogical as it matches the submission deadline.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, indicating a missed opportunity to promote sustainable practices.