Legal Compliance75/100
The notice clearly defines the open procedure and CPV codes. The proactive correction of a previous scoring error demonstrates a commitment to legal compliance, even if the initial error was a lapse. As a planning notice, it meets disclosure requirements for this stage.
Clarity80/100
The description is very clear about the notice's purpose as a correction and planning stage, and the scope of services is well-defined. However, specific eligibility, financial, and crucial evaluation criteria are explicitly deferred to the forthcoming ITT.
•Evaluation criteria not specified
Completeness70/100
Basic information, financial details, timeline, and documents are provided. Technical requirements are outlined. However, mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as missing and will be detailed in the future ITT, making it incomplete as a standalone tender document.
•Mandatory exclusion grounds not detailed
•Eligibility requirements not detailed
Fairness85/100
The commitment to rectify a previous scoring error significantly enhances fairness. The use of an e-tendering portal and disclosed value are positive. However, the absence of evaluation criteria in this notice means transparency on how bids will be judged is currently lacking, which is a key aspect of fairness for a live tender.
•Evaluation criteria not specified
Practicality65/100
Electronic submission is supported, and key dates (contract start, duration) and estimated value are provided. However, as it's explicitly 'NOT A LIVE OPPORTUNITY', immediate practical steps for bidders are limited, and a document URL is not explicitly provided in the text.
•Not a live opportunity, limiting immediate practical action
•Document URL not explicitly provided
Data Consistency90/100
All key fields are populated, and the narrative consistently explains the complex administrative process of correcting previous notices. Dates are logical and sequential, reflecting a well-managed re-initiation process.
Sustainability50/100
There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus within the provided documentation. The tender is not EU funded.
•No green procurement focus
•No social criteria