Legal Compliance100/100
The tender information lacks crucial elements typically required for public procurement. The explicit absence of mandatory exclusion grounds is a significant legal compliance concern. Without the full tender documents, it's impossible to verify adherence to all legal requirements.
•Absence of mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Lack of detailed legal terms and conditions due to missing documents.
Clarity40/100
The description of the DPS's purpose, scope, and the types of services required is clear. However, the actual requirements for suppliers (eligibility, technical, financial) are presented at a very high level, lacking the necessary detail for bidders to fully understand the qualification process. The use of 'Restricted procedure' for a DPS, while clarified in the description, could initially cause some ambiguity.
•Vague and high-level eligibility and technical requirements.
•Lack of specific evaluation criteria for joining the DPS.
Completeness83/100
The tender information is severely incomplete due to the total absence of supporting documents. Key sections like financial requirements, detailed technical specifications, and evaluation criteria are missing, making it impossible to fully understand the procurement process and prepare a comprehensive application.
•No tender documents provided.
•Absence of specific financial requirements (e.g., minimum turnover, insurance levels).
Fairness80/100
While the broad nature of a DPS aims for wide participation, the lack of detailed, measurable requirements and evaluation criteria, coupled with the absence of mandatory exclusion grounds, could lead to an inconsistent or opaque assessment process, potentially impacting fairness and equal treatment of bidders.
•Lack of clear and measurable qualification criteria.
•Absence of mandatory exclusion grounds could allow unqualified or non-compliant suppliers to participate.
Practicality40/100
The concept of a DPS for FM services is practical for the public sector. However, the lack of detailed information makes it difficult for potential suppliers to prepare a comprehensive and compliant application, potentially increasing administrative burden and uncertainty. The missing geographical scope also adds to practical challenges.
•Difficulty for bidders to prepare applications without detailed tender documents.
•Missing geographical scope (NUTS N/A) creates uncertainty regarding service delivery areas.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided data points (title, reference, organization, value, duration, CPV) are consistent with each other. The description clearly aligns with the DPS type and its intended use.
Sustainability0/100
The tender information does not include any specific requirements or considerations related to environmental, social, or innovative aspects. This represents a missed opportunity for a procurement of this scale and duration to drive broader public policy objectives.
•Absence of green procurement criteria.
•No social responsibility requirements.