Development of construction project and author supervision for traffic safety improvement at the intersection of main road A10 Riga – Ventspils and local road V1401 Stende – Lauciene – Mērsrags (Lībagi)

This tender exhibits significant deficiencies in fairness, clarity, and data consistency, primarily due to restricted document access and missing evaluation criteria, despite a clear project description and reasonable timeline.

The tender generally adheres to legal requirements with a clear procedure type, appropriate CPV code, and reasonable submission deadline. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value presents a minor transparency concern.

While the project description and references to specific technical documents are clear, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria severely impacts the overall clarity for potential bidders.

Most basic information, deadlines, and required documents are present. However, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value and, more critically, the absence of defined evaluation criteria.

Fairness is severely compromised by restricted document access and the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which hinder equal opportunity and transparent assessment. The undisclosed estimated value further reduces transparency.

Practicality is hampered by the contradiction regarding e-submission support and the absence of a direct document URL or contract start date. While duration is clear, financing information is also missing.

Significant inconsistencies exist, particularly the contradiction between 'E-Procurement' characteristic and 'No e-submission' flag, and the conflicting information regarding evaluation criteria. The undisclosed estimated value also contributes to data incompleteness.

The tender shows very low commitment to sustainability, as it lacks any explicit green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, and is not indicated as EU funded.