Legal Compliance100/100
The tender is an 'Open procedure' but lacks fundamental documentation typically required for such a process, including detailed terms of reference, contract drafts, or specific legal clauses. The absence of detailed mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements in the provided extract is also a concern, as these are usually standard legal checks.
•Absence of detailed tender documents (e.g., Invitation to Tender, Specification, Draft Contract).
•Lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements.
Clarity40/100
The project's objective and scope are generally clear from the description. However, the lack of detailed specifications, methodology requirements, and expected deliverables in formal documents creates significant ambiguity regarding the exact nature and scale of the required services.
•Lack of detailed specifications for the survey methodology, sample size specifics, reporting format, and data interpretation expectations.
•Absence of a clear Statement of Work or Terms of Reference.
Completeness83/100
The tender is severely incomplete due to the complete absence of attached documents. Key sections like evaluation criteria, detailed technical specifications, financial requirements beyond the estimated value, and contractual terms are entirely missing from the provided information.
•No attached documents whatsoever.
•Missing evaluation criteria.
Fairness60/100
The lack of detailed requirements, especially the absence of evaluation criteria, severely compromises the fairness of the procurement process. Without clear criteria, bidders cannot understand how their proposals will be judged, leading to potential subjectivity in the selection process. The highly specific experience requirements could be seen as restrictive, potentially limiting competition to a very niche group of providers.
•Absence of evaluation criteria, leading to potential subjectivity.
•Highly specific experience requirements (e.g., 'specifically include policing, community safety, Criminal Justice and/or victims and witnesses of crime') could be seen as overly restrictive and potentially tailored, limiting competition.
Practicality40/100
From a bidder's perspective, preparing a high-quality bid is impractical without detailed documentation. The broad description of technical capabilities does not provide enough information to formulate a precise methodology, resource plan, or accurate cost estimate. From the contracting authority's perspective, evaluating bids without clear criteria and detailed requirements will be challenging and prone to inconsistencies.
•Bidders cannot practically prepare detailed, competitive proposals without comprehensive tender documents.
•Evaluation will be difficult and potentially inconsistent without clear criteria and detailed specifications.
Data Consistency100/100
Based on the limited information provided, there are no apparent inconsistencies in the data. However, the lack of detailed documentation means there is very little data to check for consistency against.
Sustainability25/100
The tender description does not include any explicit mention of environmental, social, or economic sustainability criteria or considerations. The automated check also flags 'Not green procurement' and 'No social criteria.'
•Absence of explicit sustainability criteria (environmental, social, economic).