Legal Compliance100/100
The tender outlines a 'Restricted' type and 'Competitive Flexible Procedure,' implying specific legal frameworks will be followed. However, the current notification lacks essential details regarding mandatory exclusion grounds and specific financial requirements, which are fundamental for legal compliance and transparency in public procurement.
•Missing specific details on mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Absence of specific financial requirements.
Clarity40/100
The description of the works is clear regarding the technical scope and operational constraints. However, several key eligibility and technical capability requirements are vaguely defined, which could lead to subjective interpretation during the pre-qualification or evaluation stages.
•Vague definitions for 'suitably qualified Principal Contractor,' 'appropriate plant and equipment,' and 'proven experience of similar scale works.'
Completeness75/100
As a market notification, it provides a good initial overview. However, it is significantly incomplete for a full tender process, lacking critical information such as the estimated value, full tender documents, detailed evaluation criteria, and specific financial requirements.
•Estimated value not disclosed.
•No tender documents attached.
Fairness40/100
The vague nature of key requirements (e.g., 'suitably qualified,' 'proven experience of similar scale') could inadvertently limit competition or allow for subjective shortlisting, potentially favoring incumbent or specific contractors. The 'Restricted' procedure type, without clear pre-qualification criteria, also raises fairness considerations.
•Vague requirements could lead to subjective interpretation and potentially limit fair competition.
•Risk of requirements being tailored to specific companies due to broad and undefined experience/qualification criteria.
Practicality40/100
Bidders cannot practically prepare a comprehensive response or even a robust decision to participate without the estimated value, detailed requirements, and the Procurement Specific Questionnaire (PSQ). The current information serves primarily as a 'heads-up' rather than a basis for detailed preparation.
•Inability for bidders to properly assess the opportunity or prepare without estimated value and detailed PSQ.
•Lack of full tender documents.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided information within this notification is consistent and does not contain any apparent contradictions.
Sustainability0/100
While the description mentions ABP's role in 'green infrastructure,' the tender itself lacks any specific environmental, social, or governance (ESG) requirements for the dredging services, beyond mitigation for UXO which is a safety/environmental risk management.
•Absence of specific green procurement criteria.
•No social criteria specified.