Legal Compliance75/100
The notice functions as a preliminary market engagement, which is a legitimate pre-procurement activity. However, the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are explicitly marked as 'None', and the 'Estimated Value' of 1 EUR is a placeholder, which are deficiencies in formal metadata disclosure, even for a PME.
•Missing tender type and procedure definition
•Estimated value is a placeholder (1 EUR) not a true financial disclosure
Clarity85/100
The document is exceptionally clear about its purpose as a preliminary market engagement, explicitly stating it seeks supplier feedback to shape a future framework. The scope of the future framework and the current submission requirements are well-articulated and unambiguous.
Completeness70/100
Basic information like title, reference, organization, deadlines, and duration are provided. However, the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields are missing, and the 'Estimated Value' is a placeholder, indicating a lack of complete formal procurement data. Evaluation criteria are not specified, which is appropriate for a PME.
•Missing tender type and procedure definition
•Estimated value is a placeholder (1 EUR) not a true financial disclosure
Fairness85/100
The preliminary market engagement nature inherently promotes fairness by seeking broad market input. Requirements for the future framework are comprehensive and generic, not appearing tailored to any specific company. Full document access is provided. The placeholder value is a minor transparency issue but does not compromise fairness at this stage.
•Estimated value is a placeholder, impacting full transparency of potential contract value
Practicality65/100
The notice lacks explicit support for electronic submission of feedback, which could be a practical hurdle. While contract duration and start date are specified for the future framework, actual financing information is absent due to the placeholder value.
•No explicit e-submission method for feedback
•Actual financing information is not available due to placeholder value
Data Consistency70/100
While dates are logical and there are no disputes, several key fields such as 'Type', 'Procedure', and 'Liable Person' are unpopulated or marked as 'None'. The 'Estimated Value' of 1 EUR is a clear placeholder, indicating inconsistency in data population for a procurement notice.
•Missing 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields
•Missing 'Liable Person'
Sustainability90/100
The tender demonstrates a strong commitment to sustainability, explicitly mentioning contributions to 'national Net Zero ambitions,' '2D and 3D modern methods of construction,' and 'higher Pre-Manufactured Value (PMV).' It also includes social aspects by supporting diverse housing types and 'diversified supply chains,' and emphasizes 'innovation.'