Flintshire County Council Out of hours response and supervision Highway operations

This tender presents a clear service description and high-level requirements, but significant concerns exist regarding transparency, the lack of electronic submission, and the completeness of detailed documentation.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and no disputes are noted. However, the missing tender reveal date significantly impacts transparency and the ability to assess the reasonableness of preparation time. The absence of electronic submission is also a notable deviation from modern procurement compliance standards.

The service description and AI-extracted technical requirements are clear and unambiguous. High-level evaluation weights (70% price, 30% quality) are specified. However, the lack of detailed evaluation sub-criteria and an explanation of how the tender is 'Divided into Parts' reduces overall clarity.

Basic information such as title, organization, reference, value, duration, and location is provided. However, the summaries of the attached documents are generic, suggesting a potential lack of explicit detailed specifications, instructions to tenderers, or contract terms. The 'Liable Person' field is also missing, and there's a minor currency discrepancy in the estimated value.

The tender value is disclosed, and requirements do not appear tailored to a specific company. However, the missing tender reveal date hinders the assessment of reasonable preparation time, impacting transparency. The absence of electronic submission creates a barrier to equal access, and the potential lack of detailed evaluation criteria could compromise objectivity.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified, and financing information (estimated value) is available. However, the critical absence of electronic submission is a major practical drawback for potential bidders. A direct document URL is also not explicitly provided.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include the missing 'Liable Person' and a slight discrepancy in the estimated value's currency between the basic info and document summaries.

The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often drives higher sustainability standards.