Service for ward dishwashers

This tender, currently in the planning stage, provides basic information but suffers from critical deficiencies including an incorrect CPV code, undisclosed value, and a complete lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria.

The tender clearly defines the procedure type and has no disputes. However, the assigned CPV code (72416000 - Application service providers) is fundamentally incorrect for 'service for ward dishwashers', which is a significant legal and practical error. The estimated value is also classified and not disclosed, which impacts transparency.

While the service description is clear, the tender explicitly states that no specific mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capability, financial, or submission requirements are detailed. Furthermore, evaluation criteria are entirely missing, making the tender's expectations highly ambiguous for potential bidders.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, duration, and contract start date are provided. However, critical elements like the estimated value, detailed requirements (eligibility, technical, financial), and evaluation criteria are explicitly missing, which is a significant gap even for a planning notice.

The undisclosed estimated value and the complete absence of evaluation criteria significantly hinder transparency and fair competition. The lack of e-submission support also creates an unnecessary barrier for equal access, especially in modern procurement practices.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission support is a notable practical drawback. Financing information is also not available, which can be important for bidders' planning.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. However, the CPV code assigned is fundamentally inconsistent with the service described, representing a significant data error.

The tender does not indicate any focus on green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.