Pieriga, Latvia
Not disclosed
February 23, 2026 at 09:00
Other
163876
For detailed contact information, please refer to the official procurement documents.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Sign up to view document summaries and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
This tender for food supply to Jūrmala Hospital demonstrates good structural organization with detailed requirements and division into parts, but is significantly hampered by the absence of evaluation criteria and undisclosed estimated value.
The tender defines an open procedure, provides a reasonable submission deadline, and correctly assigns CPV codes. It also adheres to WTO/GPA principles and includes mandatory exclusion grounds. However, the estimated contract value is not disclosed, which is a transparency concern, and the 'Restricted document access' flag, if true for bidders, would represent a significant legal compliance issue regarding public access to tender documents.
The tender description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive regarding eligibility, technical capabilities, and submission. Detailed technical specifications are provided for each of the 14 parts. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major flaw, making it unclear how bids will be assessed.
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, deadlines, duration, and location are well-defined. A large number of detailed documents are available. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the undisclosed estimated value and, more critically, the lack of specified evaluation criteria.
The tender promotes fairness by being an open procedure, supporting e-procurement, and being divided into 14 parts, allowing for broader participation. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the critical absence of objective evaluation criteria severely undermine transparency and fairness. The 'Restricted document access' flag, if it affects bidders, would also be a major barrier to equal access.
Electronic submission is supported, and the contract start dates and duration are clearly specified, which are positive for practicality. While documents are summarized, an explicit document URL is not provided in the basic information, and detailed financing information is absent. The 'Restricted document access' flag could also pose practical challenges for bidders.
The tender exhibits good data consistency with logical dates, no reported disputes or suspensions, and most key fields populated. The only notable inconsistencies are the missing estimated value and evaluation criteria, which are data gaps rather than contradictions.
The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation-focused criteria. This represents a missed opportunity to align with broader sustainability goals.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Ask me anything about this tender
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required
Setup in 2 minutes