Term Service Contract for the Ground Maintenance of Flood Risks

This tender for flood risk asset maintenance is generally well-described with clear technical requirements and good data consistency, but it suffers from critical omissions regarding evaluation criteria and the lack of e-submission, impacting clarity, completeness, and fairness.

The procedure type and CPV code are clearly defined, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The submission period of 29 days is reasonable. However, the provided summary lacks explicit detail on mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial grounds, and the reveal date is missing, which are minor compliance gaps in the summary information.

The description of works and the AI-extracted technical capability requirements are very clear and unambiguous. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly hinders clarity for potential bidders. Additionally, the summary lacks explicit detail on mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements.

Basic information, financial details, timelines, duration, and location are well-specified, and all listed documents are available. Nevertheless, the tender is incomplete due to the critical absence of evaluation criteria. The summary also lacks explicit detail on mandatory exclusion, eligibility, and financial requirements.

The estimated value is disclosed, and documents are accessible, promoting transparency. The technical requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company. However, the absence of evaluation criteria is a significant fairness concern, as bidders cannot understand the basis of competition. The lack of e-submission also limits equal access and convenience.

The contract start date and duration are clearly specified. A major drawback for practicality is the stated lack of e-submission functionality, which is a standard expectation in modern procurement. While documents are available, a direct URL is not explicitly provided in the summary.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include the empty 'Liable Person' field and missing codes for the procedure type.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement criteria, social aspects, or an innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to promote broader public policy objectives through procurement.