United Kingdom18 days leftOpen

Heart of Horton - Park Activator

Tender Overview

LOCATION

West Yorkshire, United Kingdom

VALUE

£12,000

DEADLINE

February 20, 2026 at 17:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

73000000

REFERENCE

006464-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

This procurement is to secure the appointment of a Activity Plan Consultant (Park Activator) to produce a NLHF activity plan for Horton Park. Further information is available in the tender pack.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • Not explicitly specified in the provided tender summaries. Bidders should refer to the full tender pack for details.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Be a legal entity capable of providing Activity Plan Consultant (Park Activator) services.
  • Be a consultant invited to bid by the City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Possess the expertise and capability to produce a National Lottery Heritage Fund (NLHF) activity plan.
  • Demonstrate experience and knowledge relevant to the role of an Activity Plan Consultant (Park Activator) for park development.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Not explicitly specified in the provided tender summaries. Bidders should refer to the full tender pack for details.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit the bid by the deadline of 2026-02-20 at 17:00:00 UTC.
  • Obtain and review the full tender pack for complete submission instructions and requirements.
  • Submit a proposal detailing how the bidder will produce the NLHF activity plan for Horton Park.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

HTM
Lot L-0000
General InformationL-0000.html
Summary:
This document announces a tender by City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council to appoint an Activity Plan Consultant (Park Activator) to develop a NLHF activity plan for Horton Park, with further details available in the tender pack.
DOC
OCDS Record
OCDS Data006464-2026_ocds_record.json
Summary:
This OCDS record provides structured, machine-readable data about the tender for an Activity Plan Consultant for Horton Park, detailing the buyer and tender initiation.
DOC
OCDS Release Package
OCDS Data006464-2026_ocds_release.json
Summary:
This document is an OCDS data package providing structured information about the tender, including details about the contracting authority (City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council) and the tender's initiation.
PDF
Official PDF Version
Administrative Documents006464-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
This document is a tender notice from the City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council, inviting consultants to produce an NLHF activity plan for Horton Park, with a submission deadline of 20 February 2026.
HTM
Tender Notice
Notice006464-2026.html
Summary:
Download failed - no summary available

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

48
Fair

Tender Quality Score

This tender presents significant concerns regarding fairness and legal compliance due to a direct contradiction between its 'Open' procedure type and an eligibility requirement for 'invited' consultants, alongside a critical absence of specified evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance40/100

The tender's classification as an 'Open' procedure is directly contradicted by the eligibility requirement stating bidders must be 'invited,' which is a severe legal inconsistency. The absence of specified evaluation criteria is also a significant legal compliance issue, undermining transparency and fair competition.

Contradiction between 'Open' procedure and 'invited to bid' eligibility
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity45/100

While the project description is clear, the overall clarity of the procurement process is severely hampered by the lack of specified evaluation criteria and the contradictory eligibility requirement. Many details are deferred to the full tender pack, making the summary incomplete.

No evaluation criteria specified
Contradictory eligibility requirement
Completeness50/100

The tender provides basic information, value, and duration. However, it critically lacks specified evaluation criteria and detailed financial requirements in the summary. The failure to download one of the listed documents also impacts completeness.

No evaluation criteria specified
Financial requirements not explicitly detailed in summary
Fairness20/100

The requirement for bidders to be 'invited' despite the procedure being 'Open' is a critical fairness concern, strongly suggesting potential tailoring or a restricted competition disguised as open. The absence of objective evaluation criteria further compromises transparency and equal opportunity.

'Invited to bid' requirement for an 'Open' procedure (potential tailoring)
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender provides essential practical details like contract start and duration. However, the lack of electronic submission support is a notable practical drawback in modern procurement.

No electronic submission supported
Data Consistency85/100

The tender generally exhibits good data consistency with logical dates and no disputes. Minor inconsistencies include missing codes for the procedure type and an empty 'Liable Person' field.

Missing codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure'
'Liable Person' field is empty
Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, which is common for smaller, below-threshold contracts but represents a missed opportunity for broader impact.

No explicit green, social, or innovation criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and objective
Value, duration, and contract start date are specified
CPV code is appropriately assigned
Good data consistency for key dates and status

Concerns

Critical contradiction: 'Open' procedure requires 'invited' bidders
Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Lack of electronic submission support
One tender document failed to download
Potential for tailored requirements due to 'invited' clause

Recommendations

1. Clarify the procedure type and eligibility requirements to resolve the contradiction between 'Open' and 'invited to bid.'
2. Immediately publish comprehensive and objective evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Implement electronic submission capabilities to enhance accessibility and efficiency for bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
C
Tender Quality Score
48/ 100 · Fair

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes