Targeted Information Advice & Guidance for the Jewish Community

This tender for targeted information and guidance services clearly defines its social objective and target demographic. However, it is significantly hampered by a lack of transparency and completeness, particularly concerning evaluation criteria and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds.

The procedure type and CPV code are correctly identified, and no disputes are present. However, the absence of a reveal date, explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, and, most critically, specified evaluation criteria represent significant compliance gaps under general procurement principles, even for below-threshold procedures.

The service description and target audience are clearly articulated. Nevertheless, the complete lack of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency, making it unclear for bidders how their proposals will be assessed and significantly impacting the overall clarity of the tender process.

Basic tender information, financial details, timeline, and location are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit absence of evaluation criteria, mandatory exclusion grounds, and detailed financial requirements beyond the estimated value. The listed documents appear to be general notices rather than comprehensive tender specifications.

The estimated value is disclosed, and the specific target group is appropriate for a social service. However, the complete absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises transparency and fairness for bidders. The lack of e-submission also presents a barrier to equal access. There is no strong evidence of tailoring to a specific company.

Key practical details such as contract start date, duration, and estimated value are clearly specified. However, the absence of electronic submission is a notable practical drawback in modern procurement, potentially increasing administrative burden for potential suppliers.

The provided data is largely consistent and logical, with key dates and financial information aligning. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor omissions exist in fields such as 'Liable Person' and specific procedure codes, and the reveal date is missing.

The tender inherently addresses significant social needs by targeting a vulnerable community facing hardship, which is a strong social sustainability aspect. However, it lacks explicit criteria for environmental (green) procurement or innovation, and it is not EU funded.