United Kingdom14 days leftOpen

PEACEPLUS Works Contractor for Reconnected Belfast Project at Waterworks and Alexandra Park

Tender Overview

ORGANIZATION

Belfast City Council

LOCATION

Northern Ireland, United Kingdom

VALUE

Not disclosed

DEADLINE

February 16, 2026 at 12:00

CATEGORY

Other

CPV CODE

45000000

REFERENCE

003934-2026

Project Timeline

Contact Information

View Original

Original Tender Description

The Project focuses on re-generating Waterworks and Alexandra Park, the objective of the project is to increase cross-community integration through a transformed shared space in north Belfast, which will enable 33.18 hectares of parkland space to be upgraded and capable of facilitating participation of thousands of people from all communities. Improvements at Waterworks Park comprise the demolition of the existing Waterworks Bothy and replacement with a new building to include public toilets, Changing Places, multi-purpose community room and kitchenette, extension to existing Cavehill Road gatehouse building, entrance improvements, new events space including multipurpose decking, resurfacing of footways, new pedestrian lighting along key routes, a dog park, replacement platforms and viewing area, replacement surface to existing small sided 3G pitch, and upgrades to existing Queen Mary’s playground. Improvements at Alexandra Park include the resurfacing of footways, new pedestrian lighting along key routes, new reinforced grass event space, new lake viewing area, new public toilets and changing places, entrance improvements, 2no existing bridges replaced, new pedestrian entrance, new multi-sport synthetic surface with cover, and upgrades to existing play parks. Streetscape improvements along Camberwell Terrace and Castleton Gardens include resurfacing of footways with new kerbs; resurfaced carriageways and new tactile paving at pedestrian crossings; and all associated works. Additionally, works include refurbishment and safety works to the Waterworks upper and lower reservoirs, and Alexandra Park lake reservoir, to be complemented with wider environmental, landscape and connectivity improvements. The proposed reservoir works comprise of a new overflow structure with reinforcement and protection of the return embankment parallel to the bywash channel at Waterworks Upper reservoir, repairs to the upstream face of Waterworks Lower reservoir with the addition of wetland planting to reduce the overall capacity of the reservoir, and removal of an existing parapet wall and embankment reinforcement at the Alexandra Park Lake reservoir.
⚠️

MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS

  • No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided information.

ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Be a contractor capable of undertaking a significant, large-scale construction project.
  • Be a "PEACEPLUS Works Contractor" or demonstrate understanding/alignment with PEACEPLUS objectives for community integration.
🔧

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS

  • Demonstrate experience in general construction work (CPV 45000000).
  • Possess capability for extensive upgrades to park facilities, infrastructure, and reservoirs.
  • Demonstrate experience in demolition and construction of new buildings, including public toilets, Changing Places facilities, multi-purpose community rooms, and kitchenettes.
  • Show experience in extending existing buildings.
  • Capability in entrance improvements, creating new events spaces (including multi-purpose decking).
  • Experience in resurfacing footways and carriageways, and installing new pedestrian lighting.
  • Capability in developing specialized park features such as dog parks, replacement platforms, and viewing areas.
  • Expertise in upgrading sports facilities, including 3G pitches and multi-sport synthetic surfaces.
  • Experience in upgrading existing play parks.
  • Capability in streetscape improvements, including new kerbs and tactile paving.
  • Demonstrate experience in refurbishment and safety works for reservoirs, including overflow structures, embankment reinforcement, and repairs.
  • Capability in wider environmental, landscape, and connectivity improvements.
  • Ability to deliver a project focused on increasing cross-community integration through transformed shared spaces.
💰

FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS

  • No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided information.
📋

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

  • Submit the tender by the deadline: 2026-02-16T12:00:00+00:00.
  • The submission must be for a "Works Contractor" for the regeneration of Waterworks and Alexandra Park.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

AI-powered requirement analysis
Complete compliance breakdown
Strategic bidding insights
Instant eligibility check

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

DOC
OCDS Record
OCDS Data003934-2026_ocds_record.json
Summary:
This OCDS record provides structured data detailing a large-scale construction project for the regeneration of Waterworks and Alexandra Park in North Belfast, including park upgrades, new facilities, and reservoir refurbishment.
DOC
OCDS Release Package
OCDS Data003934-2026_ocds_release.json
Summary:
This OCDS Release Package provides comprehensive data on the Belfast City Council's large-scale construction tender for the regeneration of Waterworks and Alexandra Park, detailing extensive upgrades to parkland, infrastructure, and reservoir works to foster cross-community integration.
PDF
Official PDF Version
Administrative Documents003934-2026_official.pdf
Summary:
This document is a contract notice for a PEACEPLUS Works Contractor to regenerate Waterworks and Alexandra Park in North Belfast, involving significant parkland upgrades, new buildings, streetscape improvements, and reservoir refurbishment to increase cross-community integration.
HTM
Tender Notice
Administrative Documents003934-2026.html
Summary:
This tender notice from Belfast City Council invites contractors for a significant construction project to regenerate Waterworks and Alexandra Park, involving extensive upgrades to park facilities, infrastructure, and reservoirs to enhance community integration.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

AI document summaries
Key requirement extraction
Risk & compliance alerts
Strategic document insights

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

72
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender outlines a complex, multi-faceted construction project with a clear objective, but the provided requirements lack critical detail regarding eligibility, financial criteria, and evaluation methodology, raising concerns about transparency and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance100/100

The absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and detailed evaluation criteria in the provided information is a significant concern for legal compliance and transparency in public procurement. The undisclosed estimated value also reduces transparency.

No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed.
Missing evaluation criteria.
Clarity60/100

The project description is highly detailed and clear regarding the scope of works and objectives. However, the eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are presented at a high level without specific, measurable thresholds, which introduces ambiguity for potential bidders.

Vague eligibility requirements (e.g., 'capable of undertaking a significant, large-scale construction project').
Technical capability requirements are descriptive but lack specific metrics (e.g., project size, value, duration).
Completeness91/100

While the project description is comprehensive, the tender documentation, as presented in the extracted requirements, is significantly incomplete. Crucial elements such as specific eligibility thresholds, detailed financial requirements, and comprehensive evaluation criteria are missing.

Missing evaluation criteria.
No specific financial requirements detailed.
Fairness60/100

The lack of specific, measurable eligibility, financial, and evaluation criteria poses a significant risk to fairness. It grants the contracting authority broad discretion, potentially leading to subjective assessments. The extensive and diverse list of technical capabilities, without clear thresholds, could also limit competition to a very specific type of large, multi-disciplinary contractor.

Missing evaluation criteria, leading to potential subjectivity.
Vague eligibility and technical requirements could lead to subjective shortlisting.
Practicality40/100

The project's complexity demands a highly capable contractor. However, the lack of specific requirements and evaluation criteria makes it impractical for bidders to understand precisely what is needed to qualify and win, and for the contracting authority to conduct an objective and efficient evaluation.

Missing evaluation criteria makes practical evaluation difficult.
Vague requirements make it challenging for bidders to prepare compliant and competitive submissions.
Data Consistency100/100

The provided information appears internally consistent; the description of works aligns with the type of contractor sought and the project's objectives.

Sustainability0/100

The project inherently involves environmental and social benefits through park regeneration and community integration. However, the extracted requirements do not detail any specific 'green procurement' criteria or explicit social responsibility requirements for the contractor's performance beyond the project's core objective.

No explicit green procurement criteria.
No specific social criteria for contractor performance (beyond the project's inherent social objective).

Strengths

Highly detailed and clear project description outlining the extensive scope of works.
Clearly articulated project objective focused on cross-community integration.
Specific CPV and NUTS codes provided for clear classification.
Multiple documents referenced, suggesting a more comprehensive tender package is available.
Addresses a wide range of improvements, indicating a holistic approach to park regeneration.

Concerns

Critical absence of detailed evaluation criteria, risking subjectivity and lack of transparency.
Undisclosed estimated contract value, hindering bidders' ability to assess project scale and resource allocation.
Vague eligibility and financial requirements, creating ambiguity for potential bidders.
Broad technical capability requirements, potentially limiting competition to a very specific type of large, multi-disciplinary contractor.
Lack of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, which are standard in public procurement.

Recommendations

1. Publish comprehensive and measurable evaluation criteria, including weighting and sub-criteria, to ensure transparency and fairness.
2. Disclose the estimated contract value to provide bidders with essential financial context.
3. Introduce clear, quantifiable eligibility and financial thresholds for contractors.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

Generate DocumentsReview Documents
B
Tender Quality Score
72/ 100 · Good

Tender Assistant

Ask me anything about this tender

Tender Assistant

Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.

What are the main requirements?
When is the deadline?
Who is eligible to bid?

No credit card required

Setup in 2 minutes

Save with Notes