PKC13680 Housing Repairs - Term Maintenance Contract

This tender for housing repairs demonstrates good intent for broad participation and utilizes e-procurement, but critically lacks specified evaluation criteria and detailed financial/exclusion requirements in the provided summary, which significantly impacts clarity and fairness.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes correctly, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The submission deadline provides ample time from today's date. However, the AI summary notes a lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and the reveal date is missing, which are minor disclosure gaps in the provided information.

The overall description of the services required is clear and unambiguous. However, the tender critically lacks specified evaluation criteria, which is a major impediment to clarity for potential bidders. Additionally, the AI summary indicates a lack of specific financial requirements and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, reducing overall comprehensiveness.

Basic information, estimated value, duration, and location are all provided. Four documents are available with summaries. However, the tender is incomplete due to the explicit absence of evaluation criteria. The AI summary also highlights a lack of specific financial requirements and detailed mandatory exclusion grounds, which are crucial components for a comprehensive tender.

The tender promotes fairness by welcoming SMEs and new contractors, disclosing the estimated value, and enabling e-procurement. The submission deadline is reasonable. Nevertheless, the critical absence of evaluation criteria severely compromises fairness, as it prevents objective and transparent assessment of bids.

Electronic submission via PCS-Tender is supported, and the contract duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date is not provided, and a direct document URL is not explicitly listed in the basic information, which are minor practical inconveniences.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include missing codes for the 'Type' and 'Procedure' fields, an empty 'Liable Person' field, and the absence of a 'reveal date'.

The tender includes a positive social aspect by requiring the ability to deliver 'community benefits'. However, it lacks explicit criteria for green procurement or innovation focus, and it is not EU funded, indicating a moderate commitment to broader sustainability goals.