Provision of Adjustment Factors for the Valuation of NIHE Housing Stock

This tender demonstrates good foundational information but suffers from significant clarity and fairness issues, primarily due to missing detailed quality evaluation criteria and the absence of electronic submission.

The tender defines the procedure type and CPV codes appropriately, and there are no disputes. However, the absence of explicitly detailed mandatory exclusion grounds in the provided information and a missing reveal date are notable legal disclosure gaps. Minor administrative codes are also missing.

While the overall description and 50/50 cost-quality split are clear, the critical lack of detailed sub-criteria for the 'quality' evaluation component significantly hinders clarity. Bidders cannot fully understand how their proposals will be assessed, and performance conditions are only vaguely referenced.

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are complete. However, the tender lacks detailed sub-criteria for quality evaluation and explicit mandatory exclusion grounds, which are crucial for a comprehensive tender package.

The absence of detailed sub-criteria for the 50% 'quality' evaluation introduces subjectivity and reduces transparency, impacting fairness. Furthermore, the lack of electronic submission (e-submission) is a significant barrier to equal access and modern procurement practices.

The most significant practical drawback is the lack of electronic submission, which is a standard expectation for modern procurement processes in 2026. While other practical aspects like contract dates and duration are clear, this omission severely impacts efficiency and accessibility.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. Minor inconsistencies include an empty 'Liable Person' field, missing codes for procedure type, and a slight discrepancy between the estimated value in EUR and the GBP equivalent mentioned in a document summary.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to promote broader public policy objectives through procurement.