Legal Compliance100/100
The notice mentions 'MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS' but states 'No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are provided.' This is a significant omission for a public tender notice, as these are fundamental legal requirements. The lack of detailed financial and technical requirements also raises questions about compliance with transparency and non-discrimination principles.
•Absence of specific mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Lack of detailed legal, financial, and technical requirements in the notice.
Clarity40/100
The description of the service is clear, but the requirements are extremely vague. Without actual tender documents, the specific expectations for service providers, evaluation criteria, and contractual terms are entirely unclear.
•Vague eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.
•Absence of detailed tender documents.
Completeness83/100
The provided information is highly incomplete. Crucial elements such as full tender documents, detailed evaluation criteria, specific financial requirements, performance indicators, and contractual terms are entirely missing. This makes it impossible for potential bidders to prepare a compliant and competitive offer.
•No tender documents attached or content available.
•Missing evaluation criteria.
Fairness60/100
While the 'continually open' nature of the framework promotes market access, the extreme lack of detailed requirements and evaluation criteria creates a significant fairness issue. Without clear guidelines, the procurement process risks being opaque and potentially subjective, making it difficult for all bidders to compete on an equal footing.
•Lack of clear evaluation criteria.
•Vague requirements could lead to subjective assessment.
Practicality40/100
The concept of a continuously open framework is practical for ongoing service needs. However, the lack of detailed information makes it impractical for potential service providers to understand what is required to join and succeed within the framework. They would need to seek significant clarification or rely on external information.
•Bidders cannot practically assess their suitability or prepare an offer without detailed documentation.
•Potential for high administrative burden for both the contracting authority and bidders due to lack of clarity.
Data Consistency100/100
The provided data is internally consistent, but its brevity limits the scope for inconsistencies. The main issue is the lack of data rather than conflicting data.
Sustainability25/100
The automated check flags 'Not green procurement' and 'No social criteria.' Given the nature of 'Supported Living,' social criteria should be paramount. The absence of any mention of sustainability or social considerations is a significant oversight.
•No mention of social criteria, which are highly relevant for supported living services.
•No green procurement criteria.