Framework Agreement for in House Support Services

This tender for in-house support services presents significant deficiencies in transparency and completeness, primarily due to the absence of evaluation criteria and specific financial requirements, alongside a potentially misclassified CPV code.

The tender defines the procedure type and has no disputes. However, the CPV code appears misassigned for 'support services', and the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria constitutes a significant legal compliance issue regarding transparency and equal treatment. Details on mandatory exclusion grounds are also missing.

While the service description is clear, the overall clarity is severely hampered by the complete absence of evaluation criteria, which are fundamental for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed. Specific financial requirements are also not detailed, and technical requirements are generic.

Basic information, value, duration, and location are provided, and documents are listed. However, the tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of specified evaluation criteria and detailed financial requirements, which are essential components for a comprehensive bid submission.

The absence of evaluation criteria is a major fairness concern, as it prevents bidders from understanding the basis of award and ensures objective assessment. The lack of electronic submission also creates barriers to equal access and efficient participation for potential suppliers.

The tender's practicality is significantly reduced by the absence of an electronic submission option, which is a standard expectation in modern procurement. While contract duration and start date are clear, the lack of a direct document URL in the provided data also impacts ease of access.

Key dates are logical, and core information is consistent. However, some fields like 'Liable Person' and procedure codes are empty, and the noted absence of specific financial requirements and detailed exclusion grounds indicates gaps in the overall data completeness and consistency of detail.

The tender shows no indication of incorporating green procurement principles, social aspects, or innovation focus. This represents a missed opportunity to leverage public procurement for broader societal and environmental benefits.