Legal Compliance100/100
The chosen procedure (below threshold open competition) is appropriate for the estimated value. However, the absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds is a notable omission.
•Absence of explicit mandatory exclusion grounds.
Clarity40/100
While the tender's title and description are clear, the technical capability requirements are vague, and the majority of the evaluation criteria (75%) are unspecified, significantly reducing clarity for potential bidders.
•Vague technical capability requirements.
•75% of evaluation criteria are unspecified.
Completeness83/100
The provided tender information is severely incomplete, with no attached documents, no detailed scope of work, and only a partial indication of the evaluation criteria.
•No tender documents attached or content available.
•Missing detailed scope of work.
Fairness60/100
The lack of specific technical requirements and the absence of full evaluation criteria create a risk of subjective assessment, potentially undermining the principle of equal treatment among bidders.
•Risk of subjective evaluation due to vague requirements.
•Lack of full evaluation criteria compromises fair assessment.
Practicality40/100
The estimated value of 20,000 EUR for a 29-month contract duration for a professional housing needs study appears disproportionately low, which may impact the quality of submissions or the feasibility of the project.
•Disproportionately low estimated value for the contract duration and scope.
Data Consistency100/100
There is a significant inconsistency between the estimated value (20,000 EUR) and the contract duration (29 months), suggesting either an unrealistic budget for the stated period or a very limited, undefined scope.
•Inconsistency between estimated value and contract duration.
Sustainability0/100
The tender does not include any explicit green, social, or innovation procurement criteria.
•Absence of green procurement criteria.
•Absence of social criteria.