Legal Compliance80/100
The tender clearly defines the procedure type and CPV codes, and explicitly states compliance with the UK Procurement Act 2023. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. While mandatory exclusion grounds are not detailed in the summary, the full documentation is referenced.
Clarity55/100
The general description of the framework and its lots is clear. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria and the minimal AI-extracted requirements significantly reduce the overall clarity for potential bidders.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•AI-extracted requirements are not comprehensive
Completeness60/100
Basic information such as title, reference, organization, value, duration, and location are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the lack of detailed requirements and, most critically, the absence of defined evaluation criteria.
•Missing evaluation criteria
•Detailed requirements are not fully defined in the provided summary
Fairness50/100
The estimated value is fully disclosed, and a dedicated e-sourcing portal URL is provided, promoting transparency and access. However, the critical absence of evaluation criteria severely impacts the objectivity and transparency of the procurement process, raising significant fairness concerns.
•Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality80/100
A document URL is provided, and the contract start date and duration are clearly specified. The estimated value is also available. While an automated check flagged 'No e-submission', the use of a Delta e-sourcing platform typically implies electronic submission capabilities, which is practical.
Data Consistency90/100
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, indicating good data integrity. The 'Liable Person' field is the only minor omission.
Sustainability20/100
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This indicates a lack of integration of sustainability considerations into the procurement process.
•No green procurement aspects mentioned
•No social criteria mentioned