Legal Compliance100/100
The tender lacks explicit mandatory exclusion grounds and specific reference to applicable procurement legislation, which are fundamental for legal compliance and transparency.
•Missing explicit mandatory exclusion grounds.
•Vague reference to 'procurement legislation principles' without specifying the applicable legal framework.
Clarity40/100
The description of services is generally clear and detailed, outlining expected deliverables under the retainer. However, the overall tender process lacks clarity due to missing documents and evaluation criteria, and some sentences are truncated.
•Overall tender process unclear due to absence of full tender documents.
•Truncated sentences in the description and requirements sections.
Completeness83/100
The tender is critically incomplete due to the absence of any attached tender documents, evaluation criteria, and full mandatory exclusion grounds. The description itself contains truncated sentences.
•No tender documents attached (e.g., ITT, specifications, draft contract).
•Missing evaluation criteria.
Fairness60/100
The requirement for expertise in 'Brixx financial modelling software' is highly specific and raises significant concerns about potential tailoring to a particular provider, thereby limiting fair competition.
•Requirement for specific proprietary software (Brixx) suggests potential tailoring and limits competition.
Practicality40/100
The detailed service requirements are practical for the buyer, but the lack of e-submission and full tender documents could create practical hurdles for bidders in preparing a comprehensive and compliant offer.
•No e-submission method specified.
•Absence of full tender documents makes practical bid preparation difficult.
Data Consistency100/100
Information provided within the description and extracted requirements is generally consistent. However, the lack of full documentation prevents a comprehensive consistency check across all tender components.
Sustainability50/100
'Sustainability' is listed as a characteristic and policy requirement, which is positive. However, there are no details on how sustainability criteria will be evaluated or applied in the procurement process.
•Lack of specific details on how sustainability criteria will be evaluated or applied.