Legal Compliance100/100
The tender follows an open procedure and refers to standard legal frameworks by directing bidders to the full documents. However, the provided extract's lack of specific exclusion or eligibility criteria reduces immediate transparency, making a full legal compliance assessment impossible without accessing the external portal.
Clarity40/100
The provided information is clear regarding the project's scope and administrative details. However, the complete absence of specific mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, or financial requirements within this extract significantly diminishes overall clarity for potential bidders, forcing them to seek all critical details externally.
•Lack of specific mandatory exclusion grounds
•Lack of specific eligibility requirements
Completeness83/100
The provided tender information is highly incomplete, as all critical details regarding exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capabilities, financial requirements, and detailed submission instructions are explicitly stated as being absent and requiring reference to an external portal. No documents are attached, which is a major deficiency for an initial assessment.
•Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
•Missing eligibility requirements
Fairness60/100
The open procedure generally promotes fairness. However, the complete lack of specific requirements in the provided extract makes it impossible to assess potential tailoring or ensure a level playing field without reviewing the full documents on the external portal. This lack of transparency at the initial stage could deter some bidders.
•Inability to assess potential tailoring due to missing requirements
Practicality40/100
Bidders must navigate to an external e-sourcing portal to access any substantive information, which adds an extra step and makes a quick initial assessment of the opportunity challenging based solely on the provided extract. This reduces the practicality of the initial notice.
•Full reliance on an external portal for all substantive information
Data Consistency100/100
The limited data provided is consistent. However, the absence of detailed requirements prevents a comprehensive consistency check across various sections of the tender.
Sustainability0/100
No specific sustainability, green procurement, social, or innovation criteria are mentioned in the provided extract, nor are they flagged by the automated checks. This suggests a potential missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability objectives into a long-term infrastructure project.
•No explicit sustainability criteria
•No explicit green procurement focus