Produce effective communications materials for the Protected Site Strategies (PSS) programme. These will feed into the second iteration of the PSS Advisory Guidance.

This tender presents significant quality concerns, primarily due to missing critical documentation, the absence of evaluation criteria, and restrictive eligibility requirements, which severely impact fairness and completeness.

While the procedure type and CPV codes are clear, and the submission period is reasonable, the 'UK supplier' requirement is restrictive. More critically, the 'Page not found' errors for essential attachments, including the Commercial Response Template, represent a significant procedural flaw impacting legal compliance.

The project description and AI-extracted technical requirements are generally clear. However, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria is a major deficiency, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.

Basic information such as title, organization, value, duration, and deadlines are provided. However, the tender is incomplete due to the critical absence of evaluation criteria and the inaccessibility of key tender documents, including the submission template.

Fairness is severely compromised by several factors: the complete lack of evaluation criteria, the 'UK supplier' restriction which limits competition, the absence of e-submission, and the inaccessibility of the submission template, which hinders fair and equal preparation.

While the contract start date, duration, and financing are clear, the lack of e-submission is a practical drawback. More significantly, the 'Page not found' errors for critical documents, especially the submission template, create substantial practical hurdles for potential bidders.

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, the 'Liable Person' field is empty, and the 'Page not found' errors for documents indicate an inconsistency in the tender's published content.

The tender does not include any explicit criteria or considerations related to green procurement, social aspects, or innovation, indicating a complete lack of focus on sustainability.