Legal Compliance55/100
The inaccessibility of the 'Tender Conditions' document (Lot L-2) is a critical legal compliance issue, as it likely contains essential legal terms and detailed procedural requirements. While the procedure type, CPV code, and standstill period are correctly identified, this major flaw significantly reduces the overall score.
•Inaccessible 'Tender Conditions' document (Lot L-2)
Clarity50/100
While the general description and AI-extracted requirements are clear, the complete absence of specified evaluation criteria and the inaccessibility of the 'Tender Conditions' document severely undermine the clarity of the tender, making it difficult for bidders to understand how their proposals will be assessed.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Inaccessible 'Tender Conditions' document (Lot L-2)
Completeness50/100
Basic information such as title, organization, value, and duration is present. However, the inaccessibility of the 'Tender Conditions' document and the lack of defined evaluation criteria represent significant gaps, making the tender incomplete in critical areas.
•Inaccessible 'Tender Conditions' document (Lot L-2)
•Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness45/100
The inaccessibility of the 'Tender Conditions' document creates an unfair bidding environment by denying equal access to crucial information. Furthermore, the absence of specified evaluation criteria compromises transparency and objectivity, raising concerns about the fairness of the assessment process. No obvious tailoring of requirements was observed.
•Inaccessible 'Tender Conditions' document (Lot L-2)
•No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality60/100
The tender provides a document URL, contract start date, and financing information. However, there is a contradiction regarding e-submission support (portal mentioned vs. 'No e-submission' flag), which creates practical uncertainty. The contingency of contract duration on funding also introduces a practical risk for bidders.
•Contradiction regarding e-submission support
•Contract duration is contingent on funding
Data Consistency85/100
The data is largely consistent, with no active disputes or suspensions. Minor inconsistencies include missing fields like 'Liable Person' and 'Type Code', and a slight discrepancy in the estimated value between EUR and GBP, which are not critical.
•Missing 'Liable Person' and 'Type Code'
•Minor currency conversion discrepancy (EUR vs GBP)
Sustainability30/100
The tender does not explicitly include any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation-focused criteria. This indicates a lack of emphasis on sustainability in the procurement process.
•No explicit sustainability criteria
•No social criteria