Development of construction design, construction works, and author supervision for the object “Construction of a compact transformer substation at “NBS Aviation Base”, Rembate parish, Ogre municipality.”

This tender presents a well-structured open procedure for construction works with clear requirements, but transparency is hindered by the undisclosed estimated value and ambiguous document access. There is also a notable absence of sustainability considerations.

The tender generally complies with standard procurement procedures, featuring an open type and a reasonable 15-day submission period for works. The CPV code is appropriate, and no disputes are reported. However, the non-disclosure of the estimated value and the 'Restricted document access' flag (if implying actual access barriers for bidders) are moderate concerns.

The tender description is clear and unambiguous. AI-extracted requirements are well-structured, referring to specific detailed documents ('Nolikum', 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'). The summary of Document 5 explicitly confirms the presence of evaluation criteria, resolving an initial automated flag.

All basic information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, duration, and location, is provided. Essential documents are listed and summarized. The primary gap is the non-disclosure of the estimated value, which is a significant omission for a public tender.

The open procedure and enabled e-procurement characteristic promote fairness and equal access. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the undisclosed estimated value reduces transparency, and the 'Restricted document access' flag, even if ambiguous, raises concerns about equal access to comprehensive information for all potential bidders.

E-procurement is a positive aspect for practicality. However, the lack of a direct document URL (implied by the 'restricted access' flag), the undisclosed estimated value, and the unspecified contract start date reduce the practical ease for bidders to prepare and submit proposals.

Most core data points, such as dates, status, and dispute count, are consistent. However, there are notable contradictions between the automated check results/flags (e.g., 'No evaluation criteria', 'No e-submission', 'Restricted document access') and the provided document summaries or characteristics ('evaluation criteria' in Doc 5, 'E-Procurement', 'Documents available'). This indicates internal data processing inconsistencies.

The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or an innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU-funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.