Legal Compliance100/100
The absence of detailed tender documents, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, and evaluation criteria makes it impossible to assess full legal compliance. These are fundamental requirements for a compliant and transparent procurement process.
•No specific mandatory exclusion grounds detailed.
•Missing evaluation criteria.
Clarity40/100
While the description of services and lot structure is clear at a high level, the overall clarity for potential bidders is severely compromised by the absence of detailed specifications, scope of work, and terms in actual tender documents.
•Lack of detailed specifications for services within each lot.
•Absence of full tender documents to provide comprehensive clarity.
Completeness83/100
The provided information is highly incomplete. Key elements such as full tender documents, detailed scope of work, specific mandatory exclusion grounds, financial requirements, and evaluation criteria are entirely missing.
•No tender documents attached.
•Missing evaluation criteria.
Fairness60/100
The lack of detailed requirements, particularly the absence of evaluation criteria and full tender documents, creates a significant risk to fairness. Without clear, objective criteria, the procurement process could be perceived as arbitrary or biased. Generic requirements without further detail also pose a risk.
•Missing evaluation criteria, crucial for fair assessment of bids.
•Absence of full tender documents, hindering equal access to information for all potential bidders.
Practicality40/100
The framework structure with four lots is practical for sourcing diverse marketing services. However, the lack of detailed requirements and scope in the provided information makes it impractical for potential bidders to prepare comprehensive and competitive proposals.
•Insufficient detail in requirements to allow bidders to accurately scope and price services.
•Absence of full tender documents makes it impractical for bidders to understand the full scope and terms.
Data Consistency100/100
Based on the limited information provided, there are no apparent inconsistencies. However, the lack of comprehensive data makes a thorough consistency check impossible.
Sustainability25/100
The tender information does not include any specific sustainability (green procurement or social) criteria, which is a missed opportunity, especially for a framework agreement of this value and duration.
•No green procurement criteria.
•No social criteria.