Tenders

Rekonstrukcja wieży widokowej Ninaotsa i budowa toalety zewnętrznej

Otwarty
Termin składania ofert
Pozostało 23 dni
Marzec 25, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Budownictwo
Numer Referencyjny
306566
Wartość
€161,000
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Published
Luty 27, 2026
Kod CPV
Kryteria oceny
Total bid cost100%
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Luty 27, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Marzec 18, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Marzec 25, 2026

Otwarcie ofert

Marzec 25, 2026

Data rozpoczęcia kontraktu

Kwiecień 13, 2026

Prawdopodobieństwo wygranejPRO
🔒
Uaktualnij do Professional
Zobacz szacowane prawdopodobieństwo wygranej na podstawie danych historycznych.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analityka zamawiającegoPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analitykę zamawiającego
Zobacz wzorce wydatków, preferowane procedury i więcej.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analiza sektoraPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analizę sektora
Zobacz średnie ceny zwycięskie, poziomy konkurencji i trendy rynkowe.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Budget
€161,000
Duration
Not specified
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Type
Budownictwo
75
Ocena Jakości/100
Dobra
Benchmark rynkowy
Śr. cena wygrywająca
€524,963
Śr. liczba ofert
4.7
Konkurencja
Średnia
Zwycięzcy MŚP
94%
5,932 przeanalizowanych zamówień

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Rekonstrukcja wieży widokowej Ninaotsa i budowa toalety zewnętrznej
Electronic Submission

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

18 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (4)
Obowiązkowe (6)
Zgodność (4)
Techniczne (2)
Finansowe (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit bids for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet in an open tender procedure.
--The bid form must be used for submitting the price offer.
--The tender deadline is 2026-03-25 12:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS6
--Bidders must confirm familiarization with the site.
--In case of a joint bid, a power of attorney must be submitted.
--Bidders must agree to the terms and conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The tender is an open procedure.
--The contracting authority is Riigimetsa Majandamise Keskus.
--The tender is for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The technical description specifies requirements for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet, including the qualification of the responsible construction manager and environmental requirements.
--The tender is based on the work project and technical description.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total cost of the bid will be the primary evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--The bid form requires filling in prices for construction works and materials.

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

8 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306566_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and proof of reliability.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306566_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.7 KB

Bidders must confirm site visit, submit a power of attorney for joint bids, agree to terms, define trade secrets, and confirm non-inclusion of subcontractors subject to replacement.

Lisa 6 Hinnapakkumuse vormXLS
Lisa 6 Hinnapakkumus Ninaotsa vaatetorn.xlsx -- 22.1 KB

This document is a form for submitting a price offer for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet tender, requiring the completion of prices for construction works and materials.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306566_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.1 KB

The contracting authority Riigimetsa Majandamise Keskus will evaluate bids for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet primarily based on the total bid cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306566_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.4 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.

HankedokumentDOC
Hankedokument Ninaotsa.docx -- 23.0 KB

The State Forest Management Centre invites bids for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet in an open procurement procedure, based on the work project and technical description.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
LISA 1 Tehniline kirjeldus_Ninaotsa.docx -- 37.3 KB

This technical specification details the requirements for the reconstruction of the Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet, including the qualifications of the responsible construction manager and environmental considerations.

Lisa 4 Töövõtulepingu projektDOC
Lisa 4 Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 38.5 KB

This document is a draft of the works contract, defining the contract terms and integral parts for the public procurement 'Reconstruction of Ninaotsa Watchtower and Construction of an Outdoor Toilet'.

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

75
Dobra

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This tender for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and construction of an outdoor toilet is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks specific sustainability considerations and some document formats are not machine-readable.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements for public procurement, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and a reasonable submission deadline. There are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The duration of tender validity (3 months) is standard.

Przejrzystość80/100

The description of the project is clear, and the requirements are documented. The evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, with the total bid cost being the primary factor. Conditions for contract modification are also clearly outlined.

Kompletność70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, estimated value, and duration. However, several key documents (e.g., technical specifications, project files, drawings) are in formats not directly accessible for AI analysis, potentially hindering a full understanding of all requirements without manual review.

Some essential technical documents are in non-AI-analyzable formats (.asice, .zip).
Uczciwość85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the value is disclosed. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective. E-submission and e-procurement are utilized, promoting accessibility. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Praktyczność65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a document URL for the opening place is provided. The contract start date is specified. However, the financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the duration is defined as 'PERIOD' without a specific end date, relying on the tender valid period.

Financing information is not explicitly detailed.
Contract duration is not precisely defined beyond the tender validity period.
Spójność danych90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date, Contract Start) are logically sequenced.

Zrównoważony rozwój50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social or innovation considerations.

Mocne strony

Clear project description and objectives.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Well-defined legal and procedural aspects.

Wątpliwości

Limited sustainability considerations.
Inaccessibility of some technical documents for automated analysis.
Vague contract duration.

Rekomendacje

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, material sourcing).
2. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in machine-readable formats.
3. Clarify the expected contract duration or end date.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Dodaj do pipeline'u