Atgal į konkursus

Ninaotsa apžvalgosios aikštelės rekonstrukcija ir lauko tualeto įrengimas

Atviras
Galutinis terminas
Liko 23 dienų
Kovas 25, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Statyba
Nuoroda
306566
Vertė
€161,000
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
Vasaris 27, 2026
CPV kodas
Vertinimo kriterijai
Total bid cost100%
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Vasaris 27, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 18, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 25, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Kovas 25, 2026

Sutarties pradžios data

Balandis 13, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€161,000
Trukmė
Nenurodyta
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Statyba
75
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Gerai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€524,963
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
4.7
Konkurencija
Vidutinė
MVĮ laimėtojai
94%
5,932 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Ninaotsa apžvalgosios aikštelės rekonstrukcija ir lauko tualeto įrengimas
Elektroninis pateikimas

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

18 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose

Pateikimas (4)
Privalomas (6)
Atitiktis (4)
Techninis (2)
Finansinis (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bidders must submit bids for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet in an open tender procedure.
--The bid form must be used for submitting the price offer.
--The tender deadline is 2026-03-25 12:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS6
--Bidders must confirm familiarization with the site.
--In case of a joint bid, a power of attorney must be submitted.
--Bidders must agree to the terms and conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The tender is an open procedure.
--The contracting authority is Riigimetsa Majandamise Keskus.
--The tender is for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The technical description specifies requirements for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet, including the qualification of the responsible construction manager and environmental requirements.
--The tender is based on the work project and technical description.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The total cost of the bid will be the primary evaluation criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.
--The bid form requires filling in prices for construction works and materials.

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 8 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
306566_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.7 KB

The contracting authority will check subcontractors' backgrounds regarding criminal convictions for fraud, money laundering, or terrorist financing, requiring relevant explanations and proof of reliability.

VastavustingimusedPDF
306566_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.7 KB

Bidders must confirm site visit, submit a power of attorney for joint bids, agree to terms, define trade secrets, and confirm non-inclusion of subcontractors subject to replacement.

Lisa 6 Hinnapakkumuse vormXLS
Lisa 6 Hinnapakkumus Ninaotsa vaatetorn.xlsx -- 22.1 KB

This document is a form for submitting a price offer for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet tender, requiring the completion of prices for construction works and materials.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306566_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 4.1 KB

The contracting authority Riigimetsa Majandamise Keskus will evaluate bids for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet primarily based on the total bid cost, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
306566_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.4 KB

The Procurement Pass (ESPD) is a self-declaration by the economic operator, serving as preliminary evidence instead of certificates issued by authorities or third parties, and includes conditions set by the contracting authority and the format of expected responses.

HankedokumentDOC
Hankedokument Ninaotsa.docx -- 23.0 KB

The State Forest Management Centre invites bids for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet in an open procurement procedure, based on the work project and technical description.

Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
LISA 1 Tehniline kirjeldus_Ninaotsa.docx -- 37.3 KB

This technical specification details the requirements for the reconstruction of the Ninaotsa observation tower and the construction of an outdoor toilet, including the qualifications of the responsible construction manager and environmental considerations.

Lisa 4 Töövõtulepingu projektDOC
Lisa 4 Hankelepingu projekt.docx -- 38.5 KB

This document is a draft of the works contract, defining the contract terms and integral parts for the public procurement 'Reconstruction of Ninaotsa Watchtower and Construction of an Outdoor Toilet'.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

75
Gerai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This tender for the reconstruction of Ninaotsa observation tower and construction of an outdoor toilet is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a straightforward evaluation process. However, it lacks specific sustainability considerations and some document formats are not machine-readable.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams75/100

The tender adheres to standard legal requirements for public procurement, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and a reasonable submission deadline. There are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The duration of tender validity (3 months) is standard.

Aiškumas80/100

The description of the project is clear, and the requirements are documented. The evaluation criteria are specified as relative weighting, with the total bid cost being the primary factor. Conditions for contract modification are also clearly outlined.

Užbaigtumas70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, estimated value, and duration. However, several key documents (e.g., technical specifications, project files, drawings) are in formats not directly accessible for AI analysis, potentially hindering a full understanding of all requirements without manual review.

Some essential technical documents are in non-AI-analyzable formats (.asice, .zip).
Sąžiningumas85/100

The tender is an open procedure, and the value is disclosed. The evaluation criterion (lowest price) is objective. E-submission and e-procurement are utilized, promoting accessibility. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

Praktiškumas65/100

E-submission is mandated, and a document URL for the opening place is provided. The contract start date is specified. However, the financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the duration is defined as 'PERIOD' without a specific end date, relying on the tender valid period.

Financing information is not explicitly detailed.
Contract duration is not precisely defined beyond the tender validity period.
Duomenų nuoseklumas90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal Date, Submission Deadline, Opening Date, Contract Start) are logically sequenced.

Tvarumas50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU-funded. This area is underdeveloped.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of social or innovation considerations.

Privalumai

Clear project description and objectives.
Objective evaluation criterion (lowest price).
Mandatory e-submission and e-procurement.
Well-defined legal and procedural aspects.

Problemos

Limited sustainability considerations.
Inaccessibility of some technical documents for automated analysis.
Vague contract duration.

Rekomendacijos

1. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., environmental impact, material sourcing).
2. Ensure all critical tender documents are provided in machine-readable formats.
3. Clarify the expected contract duration or end date.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“