Tenders

Wymiana kabli średniego napięcia podziemnych w stacji Jõgeva

Otwarty
Termin składania ofert
Pozostało 1 dni
Marzec 04, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Budownictwo
Numer Referencyjny
306073
Wartość
€150,000
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Published
Luty 17, 2026
Organizacja
Kod CPV
Kryteria oceny
Design, construction, and issuance of as-built documentation for the replacement of Jõgeva station's 10 kV underground cables100%
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Luty 17, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Luty 25, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Marzec 04, 2026

Otwarcie ofert

Marzec 04, 2026

Prawdopodobieństwo wygranejPRO
🔒
Uaktualnij do Professional
Zobacz szacowane prawdopodobieństwo wygranej na podstawie danych historycznych.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analiza sektoraPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analizę sektora
Zobacz średnie ceny zwycięskie, poziomy konkurencji i trendy rynkowe.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Budget
€150,000
Duration
Not specified
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Type
Budownictwo
72
Ocena Jakości/100
Dobra
Benchmark rynkowy
Śr. cena wygrywająca
€524,963
Śr. liczba ofert
4.7
Konkurencja
Średnia
Zwycięzcy MŚP
94%
5,932 przeanalizowanych zamówień

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Realizacja prac projektowych i budowlanych związanych z wymianą kabli podziemnych 10 kV w stacji Jõgeva. Przedmiot zamówienia jest szczegółowo opisany w Załączniku 1 do dokumentów przetargowych.
Green ProcurementElectronic Submission

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

26 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (10)
Obowiązkowe (2)
Zgodność (6)
Techniczne (6)
Finansowe (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS10
--The bid must be submitted in Estonian.
--If the bid contains documents in a language other than Estonian, a translation into Estonian must be provided.
--The bid must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-03-04 12:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The bidder must confirm the absence of grounds for exclusion (using form HD Lisa 5).
--Subcontractors or other supporting entities must confirm the absence of grounds for exclusion (using form HD Lisa 51).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--The bidder must meet qualification conditions (confirmed via form HD Lisa 5).
--The bidder must comply with international sanctions.
--Subcontractors or other supporting entities must meet qualification conditions (confirmed via form HD Lisa 51).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS6
--Perform design and construction works for replacing medium voltage underground cables at Jõgeva station.
--Provide all necessary documentation as part of the works.
--Replace the specific medium voltage underground cables listed in HD Lisa 12, adhering to their names, start/end points, types, and approximate lengths.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Submit a competitive bid price (excluding taxes), as it is the sole evaluation criterion.
--If needed, subcontractors or other supporting entities must financially support the bidder (confirmed via form HD Lisa 51).

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

14 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

VastavustingimusedPDF
306073_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 5.9 KB

This document outlines the conditions for submitting a tender, including confirmations regarding the bid cost, compliance with international sanctions, power of attorney for joint bidders, and declaration of business secrets.

HD Lisa 2 Hankes osalemise avaldusDOC
HD Lisa 2 Hankes osalemise avaldus.docx -- 28.7 KB

This document is an application form for tender participation, requiring the bidder to provide contact details and confirm agreement with the tender terms.

HD Lisa 5 KinnitusedDOC
HD Lisa 5 Kinnitused.docx -- 33.6 KB

This document is a form to be completed by the bidder, containing confirmations regarding the absence of exclusion grounds and compliance with qualification criteria, as well as required data on past projects and the responsible person.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306073_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 3.0 KB

This document outlines the tender's evaluation criteria, stating that the offer's cost (excluding taxes) will be assessed with a 100% weight, awarding the lowest bid the maximum points for the design, construction, and as-built documentation of Jõgeva station's 10 kV underground cable replacement.

Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
306073_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 13.0 KB

This document outlines the grounds for exclusion and qualification conditions for bidders, requiring the submission of confirmations on form HD Annex 5 to prove their absence.

HD Lisa 1.2 Asendatavate kaablite nimekiriXLS
HD Lisa 12 Asendatavate kaablite nimekiri.xls... -- 19.4 KB

This document lists the medium-voltage underground cables to be replaced in the Jõgeva station area, specifying their names, start and end points, types, and approximate lengths.

HD Lisa 1.3 Nõuded teostusdokumentatsioonileXLS
HD Lisa 13 Nõuded teostusdokumentatsioonile.x... -- 20.8 KB

This document specifies the required documentation and protocols that must be submitted for the acceptance of the medium voltage underground cable replacement works at Jõgeva station.

HD Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
HD Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus.docx -- 50.1 KB

This document describes the technical scope of the design and construction work for replacing medium-voltage underground cables at Jõgeva station, including design, construction, and required documentation.

HD Lisa 3 Pakkujat esindava isiku volikiriDOC
HD Lisa 3 Pakkujat esindava isiku volikiri.do... -- 25.9 KB

This document is a power of attorney form, authorizing an individual to represent the tenderer in the procurement process, including submitting the bid and signing the contract.

HD Lisa 4 Ühispakkujate volikiriDOC
HD Lisa 4 Ühispakkujate volikiri.docx -- 26.4 KB

This document is a power of attorney for joint bidders, authorizing one party to act on behalf of all joint bidders in the procurement process and contract execution.

HD Lisa 5.1 Teise ettevõtja kinnitusedDOC
HD Lisa 51 Teise ettevõtja kinnitused.docx -- 28.2 KB

This document is a confirmation from a subcontractor or another entity, affirming that they have no grounds for exclusion from the procurement procedure, meet the qualification criteria, and, if necessary, will provide financial support to the tenderer and be jointly responsible for contract performance.

HD Lisa 6.1 Ehituse töövõtulepingu üldtingimusedPDF
HD Lisa 61 Ehituse töövõtulepingu üldtingimus... -- 361.5 KB

This document outlines the general terms and conditions for AS Eesti Raudtee's construction contracts, defining key concepts such as subcontractor, construction site, and warranty period.

HD Lisa 6 Ehituse töövõtulepingu eritingimusedDOC
HD Lisa 6 Ehituse töövõtulepingu eritingimuse... -- 33.7 KB

This document outlines the special conditions for the construction contract for the design and construction works of replacing medium-voltage underground cables at Jõgeva station, including contract parties, object, deadlines, and payment terms.

Pakkumuse kutse dokumentDOC
_LH_Pakkumuse kutse dokument.docx -- 43.9 KB

This document is an invitation to tender for the design and construction works of replacing medium-voltage underground cables at Jõgeva station, outlining general conditions and submission requirements.

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

72
Dobra

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This tender is generally well-structured with comprehensive documentation, but suffers from significant data inconsistencies regarding evaluation criteria and value classification, which could lead to bidder confusion. It incorporates positive sustainability aspects but lacks an innovation focus.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami75/100

The tender generally adheres to legal requirements, with reasonable deadlines and appropriate CPV codes. However, the contradiction between 'relative_weighting' in the characteristics and 'sole evaluation criterion' (lowest price) in the detailed documents presents a legal ambiguity that could be challenged.

Contradiction in evaluation criteria description (relative weighting vs. lowest price).
Przejrzystość80/100

The project description and AI-extracted requirements are clear and well-referenced to specific annexes. However, the conflicting information regarding evaluation criteria in the main characteristics versus the detailed document creates confusion for potential bidders.

Contradictory evaluation criteria in different sections of the tender information.
Kompletność70/100

Most essential information, including title, reference, organization, deadlines, and estimated value, is provided. Detailed requirements and criteria are defined across 16 documents. However, the contract duration is not explicitly stated in the main overview, and financing details are only referenced.

Contract duration not explicitly stated in the main overview.
Financing details are only referenced to annexes, not directly stated.
Uczciwość85/100

The tender appears fair with a disclosed value, reasonable deadlines, and electronic submission. The lowest price evaluation criterion is objective, and a clear tie-breaking rule is provided. The initial contradiction in evaluation criteria is a minor fairness concern, but the specific document clarifies it.

Initial contradiction in evaluation criteria (mitigated by specific document).
Praktyczność65/100

Electronic submission is supported, which is practical. However, the absence of an explicit contract start date and duration in the main overview, and no direct document URL (though implied by the system), slightly reduces immediate practicality for bidders.

Contract start date and duration not explicitly stated in the main overview.
No direct document URL provided in the basic information.
Spójność danych60/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there is a direct contradiction between 'Estimated Value: 150,000.00 EUR' and 'Value Classified: Yes'. More significantly, the evaluation criteria are inconsistently described as 'relative_weighting' in characteristics and 'sole evaluation criterion' (lowest price) in the detailed document.

Contradiction between 'Estimated Value' and 'Value Classified' status.
Major inconsistency in evaluation criteria description ('relative_weighting' vs. 'sole evaluation criterion').
Zrównoważony rozwój50/100

The tender explicitly includes Green Procurement and Social Criteria, which is a positive aspect. However, there is no specific focus on innovation, and it is not indicated as EU-funded, which often implies higher sustainability standards.

No explicit innovation focus.
Not indicated as EU-funded.

Mocne strony

Comprehensive documentation with detailed annexes.
Clear technical description and AI-extracted requirements.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Inclusion of Green Procurement and Social Criteria.
Reasonable submission deadline.

Wątpliwości

Significant contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative weighting vs. lowest price).
Inconsistency regarding estimated value disclosure ('Value Classified: Yes' despite value being stated).
Contract duration not explicitly stated in the main overview.
Two DWG files not processed by AI (potential accessibility issue for some systems).

Rekomendacje

1. Correct the metadata regarding evaluation criteria to accurately reflect the lowest price as the sole criterion.
2. Clarify the 'Value Classified' flag if the value is indeed disclosed.
3. Explicitly state the estimated contract duration in the main tender overview for better transparency.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Dodaj do pipeline'u