Prace projektowe dla powierzchni magazynowej przy Ädala 25
ZamkniętyOryginalny Opis Przetargu
Uruchom analizę ryzyka
Zidentyfikuj potencjalne ryzyka, niespójności i sygnały ostrzegawcze we wszystkich dokumentach przetargowych. Uzyskaj szczegółowy raport ryzyka z poziomami dotkliwości i zaleceniami dotyczącymi ich ograniczania.
Zaloguj sięStrategia wygrywania
Uzyskaj strategię wygrywania opartą na sztucznej inteligencji, dopasowaną do tego przetargu. Obejmuje wskaźnik prawdopodobieństwa wygranej, kluczowe szanse i wyzwania, zalecane obszary oferty, analizę pozycji konkurencyjnej oraz praktyczne rekomendacje maksymalizujące Twoje szanse.
Zaloguj sięKonkurenci
Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.
Zaloguj sięWymagania i Kwalifikacje
1 wymagań w 1 kategoriach
Podgląd wymagań
Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę
Dokumenty
11 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI
This document outlines general bid submission conditions, procedures for marking business secrets, the bid price structure using Forms 2 and 3, and the required qualifications for project team specialists.
This form collects bidders' net turnover for the last two financial years and references for past contracts to confirm their qualification.
This form is the bidder's declaration confirming the offer's compliance with tender conditions, agreement to the contracting authority's terms, accuracy of the offer price in Form 3, and declaration of business secrets.
This tender cost table is for submitting the total cost of the offer and the cost of construction-time consulting services for the Ädala 25 warehouse design works procurement, where the bidder must fill in the respective cell.
This is Form 4 – CV, which requires details for the project manager and the strong current/electrical specialist, including name, date of birth, email, and competence certificate number.
This form is a power of attorney used for joint bids, authorizing one bidder to act on behalf of others.
This document outlines the tender evaluation criteria, where the total cost of works is the sole criterion, accounting for 100% of the weight, and the lowest price receives the maximum points.
This document outlines bidder exclusion grounds, requires a net turnover of at least 100,000 EUR for the last two financial years, and two similar design project references within the last 36 months.
This proposal for tender submission outlines the procedure for submitting bids, required formats, access restrictions for technical specifications, and contact details.
This document outlines the technical specifications, tasks, principles, and requirements for materials and systems for the design work of the Ädala 25 warehouse, aiming to modernize the existing building.
This document is a draft design service contract for the Ädala 25 warehouse project, outlining special conditions regarding client and contractor roles, project scope, and other contractual details.
Podgląd dokumentów
Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów
Ocena Jakości Przetargu
This tender is generally well-structured and clear, particularly regarding its objectives and evaluation criteria. However, concerns exist regarding transparency due to restricted document access and a contradiction in value classification, which could impact fairness and data consistency.
Szczegółowy Wynik
The tender clearly defines the procedure type and uses appropriate CPV codes. It references national procurement law (RHS) and includes the 'or equivalent' clause for standards. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The main concern is the contradiction between 'Estimated Value: 52,000.00 EUR' and 'Value Classified: Yes', which creates ambiguity regarding transparency. Additionally, the presence of restricted access information, while legally permissible, requires careful management to ensure full compliance with transparency principles.
The tender's main description is clear and concise. Evaluation criteria are explicitly stated as 100% lowest price, which is highly unambiguous. The document summaries suggest that technical specifications, qualification requirements, and contractual terms are well-documented. The 'Additional Info 1' regarding standards further enhances clarity.
All basic information such as title, reference, organization, and liable person are provided. Key timelines, estimated value, and contract duration are specified. The tender includes 11 documents covering qualification, technical specifications, evaluation criteria, and a draft contract, indicating a comprehensive set of materials. Location information is also clearly stated.
The tender supports e-procurement and electronic submission, promoting equal access. Evaluation criteria are objective and transparent (lowest price). However, the 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed estimated value creates a minor transparency issue. A more significant concern for fairness is the explicit mention of 'piiratud juurdepääsuga teave' (restricted access information) in the tender documents, which, while legally allowed, can create barriers and potentially disadvantage some bidders if the access process is not perfectly equitable. The turnover requirement of 100,000 EUR for a 52,000 EUR project is relatively high, potentially limiting competition for smaller, capable firms.
The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, which are highly practical. The contract duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date is noted as 'presumptive and has no legal meaning,' which can introduce uncertainty for planning. Financing information beyond the estimated value is not explicitly detailed.
Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The primary inconsistency is the contradiction between 'Estimated Value: 52,000.00 EUR' and 'Value Classified: Yes'. This indicates a data entry error or an unclear classification status.
The tender explicitly lists 'Green Procurement' as a characteristic, which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks explicit mention of social criteria or an innovation focus, as highlighted by the automated checks. It is also not EU funded, which often correlates with higher sustainability standards.
Mocne strony
Wątpliwości
Rekomendacje
Podgląd oceny AI
Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę
Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty
Kopilot AI
Dzień dobry! Jestem Państwa asystentem AI do tego przetargu. Mogę pomóc w zrozumieniu wymagań, terminów, kryteriów kwalifikowalności oraz dostarczyć strategicznych spostrzeżeń.
Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana