Tenders

Budowa małych rozwiązań dla integracji uczniów ze specjalnymi potrzebami edukacyjnymi w Gimnazjum Językowym w Narwie i Szkole Kreenholm w Narwie

Zamknięty
Termin składania ofert
Pozostało 0 dni
Marzec 02, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Budownictwo
Numer Referencyjny
305792
Wartość
€209,000
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Published
Luty 03, 2026
Kod CPV
Kryteria oceny
Total offer cost excluding taxes100%
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Luty 03, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Luty 23, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Marzec 02, 2026

Otwarcie ofert

Marzec 02, 2026

Prawdopodobieństwo wygranejPRO
🔒
Uaktualnij do Professional
Zobacz szacowane prawdopodobieństwo wygranej na podstawie danych historycznych.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analityka zamawiającegoPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analitykę zamawiającego
Zobacz wzorce wydatków, preferowane procedury i więcej.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analiza sektoraPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analizę sektora
Zobacz średnie ceny zwycięskie, poziomy konkurencji i trendy rynkowe.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Budget
€209,000
Duration
7 months
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Type
Budownictwo
77
Ocena Jakości/100
Dobra
Benchmark rynkowy
Śr. cena wygrywająca
€524,963
Śr. liczba ofert
4.7
Konkurencja
Średnia
Zwycięzcy MŚP
94%
5,932 przeanalizowanych zamówień

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Przedmiotem niniejszego zamówienia publicznego jest budowa małych rozwiązań jako generalny wykonawca w celu integracji uczniów ze specjalnymi potrzebami edukacyjnymi w Gimnazjum Językowym w Narwie i Szkole Kreenholm w Narwie.
EU FundedElectronic Submission

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

17 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (7)
Obowiązkowe (1)
Zgodność (5)
Techniczne (3)
Finansowe (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS7
--Submit the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), providing information on the tenderer's qualification, financial, and technical capability.
--Present the cost structure of the bid.
--Submit the total cost of the bid excluding taxes.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tenderer and its first-tier subcontractors must not have mandatory exclusion grounds related to criminal offenses (fraud, money laundering, human trafficking).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The bid must comply with the terms and conditions of the draft contract.
--The bid must meet the contracting authority's established conditions regarding qualification, financial, and technical capability (to be specified in the ESPD).
--If submitting a joint bid, provide a power of attorney.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Perform the construction of small-scale solutions as a main contractor for the integration of HEV students at Narva Keeltelütseum and Narva Kreenholmi Kool, according to the technical description.
--Adhere to the contract performance duration (7 months).
--Ensure the quality of the works performed according to the technical description.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Submit the total cost of the bid excluding taxes.

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

9 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
305792_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 20.8 KB

This document outlines the mandatory exclusion grounds for first-tier subcontractors related to criminal offenses such as fraud, money laundering, and human trafficking, detailing the information required regarding these grounds during the contract performance phase.

VastavustingimusedPDF
305792_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 5.8 KB

This document specifies key tender submission conditions, including joint bid authorization, confirmation of bid compliance, cost presentation structure, and requirements regarding subcontractors.

Lisa 2. Pakkumuse maksumustabel KeeltelütseumXLS
Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumustabel nr 1 (Keeltelü... -- 23.9 KB

This document is the tender cost table for the Narva Keeltelütseum project, where bidders must submit unit prices and total costs for design and construction works.

Lisa 2. Pakkumuse maksumustabelXLS
Lisa 2 Pakkumuse maksumustabel.xlsx -- 31.7 KB

This document is a tender cost table requiring bidders to detail expenses for construction works, including demolition and preparation tasks.

Lisa 3. Pakkumuse maksumustabel Kreenholmi KoolXLS
Lisa 3 Pakkumuse maksumustabel nr 2 (Kreenhol... -- 24.3 KB

This document is a tender cost table for the construction of small solutions for the integration of SEN students at Narva Kreenholm School, requiring bidders to provide unit and total costs for design and external facilities.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305792_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document describes the tender evaluation methodology, where the total offer cost excluding taxes is the sole criterion, with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305792_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 69.4 KB

This document serves as an explanatory guide for completing the European Single Procurement Document (ESPD), outlining the contracting authority's conditions and the information required from companies regarding their qualification, financial, and technical capabilities for the Narva schools construction tender.

Lisa 1. Tehniline kirjeldusDOC
Lisa 1 Tehniline kirjeldus (HEV).docx -- 24.6 KB

This document describes the main contractor work for constructing small-scale solutions to integrate special educational needs (SEN) students into Narva Keeltelütseum and Narva Kreenholmi Kool, detailing the scope of work, deadlines, locations, and quality requirements.

Lisa 4. Hankelepingu projektDOC
Lisa 4 Hankelepingu projekt (HEV).docx -- 48.9 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract outlining the terms and conditions between Narva City Government's Department of City Management and the contractor for building small-scale solutions in Narva schools.

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

77
Dobra

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This tender is generally well-structured and comprehensive, providing clear requirements and documentation for a construction project aimed at integrating special educational needs students. However, a notable inconsistency between the stated 'Open Procedure' and the characteristic 'Negotiation Allowed' raises concerns regarding legal compliance, clarity, fairness, and data consistency.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami70/100

The tender generally adheres to standard procurement practices with clear mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements. However, the characteristic 'Negotiation Allowed' is highly unusual and potentially legally problematic for a procedure explicitly stated as 'Procedure: A' (typically an Open Procedure in Estonia), which generally prohibits negotiations. This inconsistency could lead to legal challenges. The CPV code is also quite broad.

Inconsistency between 'Open Procedure' and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic.
Broad CPV code (5867) for specific school construction work.
Przejrzystość80/100

The tender description, AI-extracted requirements, and supporting documents (technical description, draft contract, cost tables) are generally clear and well-structured. Evaluation criteria (lowest price) are explicitly stated. The only minor ambiguity arises from the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic, which, if applied to an Open Procedure, lacks clarity on how such negotiations would be conducted transparently.

Ambiguity regarding the application of 'Negotiation Allowed' within an 'Open Procedure'.
Kompletność90/100

The tender is highly complete, providing all essential basic information, financial details, timelines, and location data. A comprehensive set of 10 documents, including detailed technical specifications, a draft contract, and specific cost tables for each school, ensures bidders have all necessary information for preparation.

Uczciwość75/100

The tender promotes fairness through full document access, disclosed value, reasonable preparation time, objective lowest-price evaluation criteria, and e-procurement. Requirements appear generic and not tailored. However, the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic, if applied to an Open Procedure, could compromise transparency and equal treatment among bidders, potentially introducing subjectivity into the process. The decision not to divide the tender is justified.

Potential for reduced transparency and equal treatment due to 'Negotiation Allowed' in an 'Open Procedure'.
Praktyczność90/100

The tender is practical, supporting electronic submission and providing a clear URL for the opening. Financing information and contract duration are clearly specified. The lack of an explicit contract start date is standard and does not hinder practicality.

Spójność danych60/100

While most key fields are populated and dates are logical, there is a significant inconsistency between the stated 'Procedure: A' (Open Procedure) and the 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic. These two elements are typically mutually exclusive in standard procurement practices, creating a contradiction in the tender's fundamental process definition.

Fundamental inconsistency between 'Procedure: A' (Open Procedure) and 'Negotiation Allowed'.
Zrównoważony rozwój50/100

The project's core objective is socially beneficial (integration of SEN students). However, the tender documentation does not explicitly incorporate green procurement criteria, additional social clauses for the contractor's performance, or an innovation focus in the selection or execution requirements, despite being EU funded.

Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
Absence of additional social criteria for contractor performance.

Mocne strony

Comprehensive documentation with detailed technical specifications and cost tables.
Clear and objective evaluation criteria (lowest price).
Full transparency regarding estimated value and e-procurement support.
Project's strong social objective (integration of SEN students).
Reasonable submission deadline for preparation.

Wątpliwości

Inconsistency between 'Open Procedure' and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic.
Potential for reduced transparency and fairness if negotiations are conducted in an Open Procedure.
Broad CPV code.
Lack of explicit green, social (beyond project scope), or innovation criteria in the tender requirements.

Rekomendacje

1. Clarify or correct the procedure type and negotiation characteristic to ensure legal compliance and transparency. If it is an Open Procedure, remove 'Negotiation Allowed.' If negotiations are intended, specify the correct procedure type (e.g., Negotiated Procedure) and outline the negotiation process.
2. Consider refining the CPV code to be more specific to school construction or renovation works.
3. Integrate explicit green procurement, social responsibility, or innovation criteria into future tenders, especially given EU funding.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Dodaj do pipeline'u