Tenders

Zakup licencji Atlassian i wsparcia produktu

Otwarty
Termin składania ofert
Pozostało 3 dni
Marzec 06, 2026
Szczegóły umowy
Kategoria
Usługi
Numer Referencyjny
305392
Wartość
€250,000
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Published
Styczeń 30, 2026
Kod CPV
Kryteria oceny
Total cost of the bid as per the technical description100%
Harmonogram Projektu

Ogłoszenie przetargu

Styczeń 30, 2026

Termin składania pytań

Luty 27, 2026

Termin składania ofert

Marzec 06, 2026

Otwarcie ofert

Marzec 06, 2026

Data rozpoczęcia kontraktu

Kwiecień 01, 2026

Prawdopodobieństwo wygranejPRO
🔒
Uaktualnij do Professional
Zobacz szacowane prawdopodobieństwo wygranej na podstawie danych historycznych.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analityka zamawiającegoPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analitykę zamawiającego
Zobacz wzorce wydatków, preferowane procedury i więcej.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Analiza sektoraPRO
🔒
Odblokuj analizę sektora
Zobacz średnie ceny zwycięskie, poziomy konkurencji i trendy rynkowe.
Uaktualnij do wersji profesjonalnej →
Budget
€250,000
Duration
12 months
Lokalizacja
Estonia
Type
Usługi
75
Ocena Jakości/100
Dobra
Benchmark rynkowy
Śr. cena wygrywająca
€187,707
Śr. liczba ofert
2.0
Konkurencja
Niska
Zwycięzcy MŚP
89%
1,029 przeanalizowanych zamówień

Oryginalny Opis Przetargu

Przedmiotem zamówienia jest zakup licencji z rodziny produktów Atlassian i przedłużenie wsparcia produktu, zakup nowych licencji na wtyczki wraz ze wsparciem produktu oraz niezbędne szkolenia, konsultacje i prace konfiguracyjne do wdrożenia zakupionych licencji. Zamawiający może również zamówić produkty, które nie są wymienione w specyfikacji technicznej, ale są funkcjonalnie interoperacyjne z przedmiotem zamówienia.
Electronic Submission

Analiza ryzyka

Zaloguj się, aby korzystać z analizy ryzyka.

Zaloguj się

Strategia wygrywania

Zaloguj się, aby uzyskać dostęp do rekomendacji strategii wygrywania.

Zaloguj się

Konkurenci

Ulepsz plan, aby zobaczyć, które firmy prawdopodobnie złożą ofertę w tym przetargu, na podstawie historycznych danych zamówień publicznych.

Zaloguj się

Wymagania i Kwalifikacje

25 wymagań w 5 kategoriach

Składanie (9)
Obowiązkowe (2)
Zgodność (4)
Techniczne (8)
Finansowe (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Submit the bid according to the required cost structure.
--Mark information designated as business secret in the bid.
--Submit a power of attorney if the bid is submitted by an authorized person.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Neither the bidder nor first-tier subcontractors must fall under exclusion grounds (e.g., crime, corruption).
--The bidder must confirm that they are not subject to Russia and Belarus sanctions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The bid must comply with the terms described in the draft contract.
--The bid must comply with all basic tender documents.
--The bidder must meet the qualification requirements described in the procurement pass.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--The bid must include Atlassian licenses and product support.
--The bid must include licenses for new plugins.
--The bid must include training.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid must include the total cost.
--The total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion (the lowest price receives maximum points).

Podgląd wymagań

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Dokumenty

7 dokumentów dostępnych z podsumowaniami AI

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
305392_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 43.7 KB

This document details the conditions for checking subcontractors and the grounds for their exclusion (e.g., criminal activity, corruption), requiring the tenderer to submit declarations regarding their own and first-tier subcontractors' qualifications.

VastavustingimusedPDF
305392_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.6 KB

This document outlines tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint bid power of attorney, marking business secrets, confirming compliance with tender documents, technical description, signing, and the structure for submitting the offer price, requiring bidders to confirm adherence to these conditions.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305392_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document describes the tender evaluation criteria, where the sole criterion is the total cost of the offer (100% weight), with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305392_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 62.2 KB

This document is an explanatory procurement pass outlining the bidder's qualification requirements and exclusion grounds, which must be completed electronically.

Hankelepingu projektPDF
305392-Hankelepingu-projekt_0.pdf -- 135.7 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract for the purchase of Atlassian licenses and product support, outlining the contract terms, including the subject matter and payment procedures.

Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
305392-Tehniline-kirjeldus.pdf -- 156.0 KB

This document outlines the technical requirements for purchasing and extending Atlassian licenses and product support, including new plugin licenses, training, consultation, and configuration services, emphasizing the acceptance of equivalent products and the Estonian language requirement for consultations.

Vastavustingimuste vormPDF
305392-Vastavustingimused_0.pdf -- 115.5 KB

This document outlines the requirements for submitting a bid, including technical specification compliance, cost structure, business secret definition, power of attorney needs, and confirmations regarding Russia and Belarus sanctions.

Podgląd dokumentów

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć podsumowania i analizę dokumentów

75
Dobra

Ocena Jakości Przetargu

This tender demonstrates good overall quality with clear financial criteria and a commitment to fairness through the allowance of equivalent products. However, a notable inconsistency in the defined procedure type and a lack of explicit sustainability criteria present areas for improvement.

Szczegółowy Wynik

Zgodność z przepisami75/100

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, including reasonable deadlines and proper CPV code assignment. Mandatory disclosure and sanctions checks are in place. However, the designation of 'Procedure: A' (Open procedure) while simultaneously stating 'Negotiation Allowed' creates a significant legal ambiguity, as open procedures typically do not permit negotiation.

Inconsistency between 'Procedure: A' (Open procedure) and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic.
Przejrzystość80/100

The tender description and AI-extracted requirements are largely clear and understandable. Evaluation criteria are explicitly defined as lowest price. The allowance for equivalent products enhances clarity regarding acceptable solutions. A minor point of ambiguity arises from the possibility of ordering unlisted, functionally compatible products.

The description allows for ordering unlisted, functionally compatible products, which could introduce minor ambiguity regarding the full scope.
Kompletność70/100

All essential basic information, including title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, and location, is provided. A comprehensive set of 8 documents supports the tender. However, the technical description's allowance for ordering unlisted, functionally compatible products suggests it may not be fully exhaustive, potentially impacting bid preparation.

The technical description's allowance for ordering unlisted, functionally compatible products suggests it may not be fully exhaustive, potentially impacting bid preparation.
Uczciwość85/100

Fairness is a strong aspect of this tender. Full document access is implied, the value is disclosed, and the lowest price evaluation criterion is objective and transparent. Crucially, the allowance for 'equivalent products' significantly enhances competition and prevents vendor lock-in, ensuring a level playing field.

Praktyczność65/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, which is practical. Key dates like contract start and duration are clearly specified. However, the procedural ambiguity regarding 'Negotiation Allowed' within an 'Open Procedure' could create practical confusion for bidders on how to structure their offers and what to expect from the process.

The ambiguity of 'Negotiation Allowed' in an 'Open Procedure' context could create practical confusion for bidders regarding the submission and evaluation process.
Spójność danych90/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no detected disputes or suspensions. The primary inconsistency lies in the conflicting information regarding the procurement procedure type ('Procedure: A' vs. 'Negotiation Allowed').

Inconsistency between 'Procedure: A' (Open procedure) and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic.
Zrównoważony rozwój50/100

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While this is common for IT license procurement, it represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals.

Absence of explicit green, social, or innovation criteria.

Mocne strony

Clear financial information and objective lowest price evaluation criterion.
Allowance for equivalent products, promoting competition and fairness.
Comprehensive set of tender documents provided.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Clear contract duration and start date.

Wątpliwości

Inconsistency between 'Procedure: A' (Open procedure) and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic.
The technical description allows for ordering unlisted, functionally compatible products, which could lead to scope ambiguity.
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.

Rekomendacje

1. Clarify the exact procurement procedure type, resolving the inconsistency between 'Open Procedure' and 'Negotiation Allowed' to ensure legal compliance and bidder understanding.
2. Refine the technical description to better define the scope for potentially unlisted products, or provide a clearer framework for their inclusion, to enhance completeness and reduce ambiguity.
3. Consider integrating relevant sustainability, social, or innovation criteria, even for IT procurement, to align with modern public procurement best practices.

Podgląd oceny AI

Zarejestruj się, aby zobaczyć pełne wymagania i analizę

Pełna analiza oceny jakości
Szczegółowy rozkład ocen cząstkowych
Mocne strony i obawy – informacje
Rekomendacje strategiczne

Karta kredytowa nie jest wymagana • Konfiguracja w 2 minuty

Dodaj do pipeline'u