Atgal į konkursus

„Atlassian“ licencijų ir produkto palaikymo pirkimas

Atviras
Galutinis terminas
Liko 3 dienų
Kovas 06, 2026
Informacija apie sutartį
Kategorija
Paslaugos
Nuoroda
305392
Vertė
€250,000
Vieta
Estonia, Estija
Paskelbta
Sausis 30, 2026
CPV kodas
Vertinimo kriterijai
Total cost of the bid as per the technical description100%
Projekto grafikas

Konkursas paskelbtas

Sausis 30, 2026

Klausimų pateikimo terminas

Vasaris 27, 2026

Pasiūlymų pateikimo terminas

Kovas 06, 2026

Konkurso atidarymas

Kovas 06, 2026

Sutarties pradžios data

Balandis 01, 2026

Laimėjimo tikimybėPRO
🔒
Atnaujinti į Professional
Peržiūrėkite savo apskaičiuotą laimėjimo tikimybę pagal istorinius duomenis.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Pirkėjo analitikaPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite pirkėjo analitiką
Peržiūrėkite išlaidų modelius, pageidaujamas procedūras ir kita.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Sektoriaus įžvalgosPRO
🔒
Atrakinkite sektoriaus įžvalgas
Peržiūrėkite vidutines laimėjimo kainas, konkurencijos lygius ir rinkos tendencijas.
Atnaujinti į Professional →
Biudžetas
€250,000
Trukmė
12 mėnesių
Vieta
Estonia
Tipas
Paslaugos
75
Kokybės įvertinimas/100
Gerai
Rinkos lyginamoji analizė
Vidutinė laimėjimo kaina
€187,707
Vidutinis pasiūlymų skaičius
2.0
Konkurencija
Žema
MVĮ laimėtojai
89%
1,029 išanalizuotų pirkimų skaičius

Originalus konkurso aprašymas

Pirkimo objektas – „Atlassian“ produktų šeimos licencijų pirkimas ir produkto palaikymo pratęsimas, naujų papildinių licencijų su produkto palaikymu pirkimas, taip pat reikalingi mokymai, konsultacijos ir konfigūravimo darbai įsigytoms licencijoms diegti. Perkančioji organizacija gali užsakyti ir produktus, kurie nėra nurodyti techninėje specifikacijoje, bet yra funkcionaliai suderinami su pirkimo objektu.
Elektroninis pateikimas

Rizikos analizė

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti rizikos analizę.

Prisijungti

Laimėjimo strategija

Prisijunkite, kad galėtumėte naudoti laimėjimo strategijos rekomendacijas.

Prisijungti

Konkurentai

Atnaujinkite, kad matytumėte, kurios įmonės greičiausiai pateiks pasiūlymą šiam konkursui, remiantis istoriniais viešųjų pirkimų duomenimis.

Prisijungti

Reikalavimai ir kvalifikacija

25 reikalavimų 5 kategorijose

Pateikimas (9)
Privalomas (2)
Atitiktis (4)
Techninis (8)
Finansinis (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--Submit the bid according to the required cost structure.
--Mark information designated as business secret in the bid.
--Submit a power of attorney if the bid is submitted by an authorized person.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--Neither the bidder nor first-tier subcontractors must fall under exclusion grounds (e.g., crime, corruption).
--The bidder must confirm that they are not subject to Russia and Belarus sanctions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS4
--The bid must comply with the terms described in the draft contract.
--The bid must comply with all basic tender documents.
--The bidder must meet the qualification requirements described in the procurement pass.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--The bid must include Atlassian licenses and product support.
--The bid must include licenses for new plugins.
--The bid must include training.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The bid must include the total cost.
--The total cost of the bid is the sole evaluation criterion (the lowest price receives maximum points).

Reikalavimų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Dokumentai

Yra 7 dokumentų su AI santraukomis

Alltöövõtjate kontrollimise tingimused lepingu täitmise etapisPDF
305392_alltoovotjate_kontrollimise_tingimused... -- 43.7 KB

This document details the conditions for checking subcontractors and the grounds for their exclusion (e.g., criminal activity, corruption), requiring the tenderer to submit declarations regarding their own and first-tier subcontractors' qualifications.

VastavustingimusedPDF
305392_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 6.6 KB

This document outlines tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint bid power of attorney, marking business secrets, confirming compliance with tender documents, technical description, signing, and the structure for submitting the offer price, requiring bidders to confirm adherence to these conditions.

Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305392_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document describes the tender evaluation criteria, where the sole criterion is the total cost of the offer (100% weight), with the lowest price receiving maximum points.

Hankepass täiendatavate selgitustegaPDF
305392_hankepass_taiendavate_selgitustega.pdf -- 62.2 KB

This document is an explanatory procurement pass outlining the bidder's qualification requirements and exclusion grounds, which must be completed electronically.

Hankelepingu projektPDF
305392-Hankelepingu-projekt_0.pdf -- 135.7 KB

This document is a draft procurement contract for the purchase of Atlassian licenses and product support, outlining the contract terms, including the subject matter and payment procedures.

Tehniline kirjeldusPDF
305392-Tehniline-kirjeldus.pdf -- 156.0 KB

This document outlines the technical requirements for purchasing and extending Atlassian licenses and product support, including new plugin licenses, training, consultation, and configuration services, emphasizing the acceptance of equivalent products and the Estonian language requirement for consultations.

Vastavustingimuste vormPDF
305392-Vastavustingimused_0.pdf -- 115.5 KB

This document outlines the requirements for submitting a bid, including technical specification compliance, cost structure, business secret definition, power of attorney needs, and confirmations regarding Russia and Belarus sanctions.

Dokumentų peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte dokumentų santraukas ir analizę

75
Gerai

Konkurso kokybės įvertinimas

This tender demonstrates good overall quality with clear financial criteria and a commitment to fairness through the allowance of equivalent products. However, a notable inconsistency in the defined procedure type and a lack of explicit sustainability criteria present areas for improvement.

Įvertinimo detalės

Atitiktis teisės aktams75/100

The tender generally complies with legal requirements, including reasonable deadlines and proper CPV code assignment. Mandatory disclosure and sanctions checks are in place. However, the designation of 'Procedure: A' (Open procedure) while simultaneously stating 'Negotiation Allowed' creates a significant legal ambiguity, as open procedures typically do not permit negotiation.

Inconsistency between 'Procedure: A' (Open procedure) and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic.
Aiškumas80/100

The tender description and AI-extracted requirements are largely clear and understandable. Evaluation criteria are explicitly defined as lowest price. The allowance for equivalent products enhances clarity regarding acceptable solutions. A minor point of ambiguity arises from the possibility of ordering unlisted, functionally compatible products.

The description allows for ordering unlisted, functionally compatible products, which could introduce minor ambiguity regarding the full scope.
Užbaigtumas70/100

All essential basic information, including title, reference, organization, value, deadlines, and location, is provided. A comprehensive set of 8 documents supports the tender. However, the technical description's allowance for ordering unlisted, functionally compatible products suggests it may not be fully exhaustive, potentially impacting bid preparation.

The technical description's allowance for ordering unlisted, functionally compatible products suggests it may not be fully exhaustive, potentially impacting bid preparation.
Sąžiningumas85/100

Fairness is a strong aspect of this tender. Full document access is implied, the value is disclosed, and the lowest price evaluation criterion is objective and transparent. Crucially, the allowance for 'equivalent products' significantly enhances competition and prevents vendor lock-in, ensuring a level playing field.

Praktiškumas65/100

The tender supports electronic submission and e-procurement, which is practical. Key dates like contract start and duration are clearly specified. However, the procedural ambiguity regarding 'Negotiation Allowed' within an 'Open Procedure' could create practical confusion for bidders on how to structure their offers and what to expect from the process.

The ambiguity of 'Negotiation Allowed' in an 'Open Procedure' context could create practical confusion for bidders regarding the submission and evaluation process.
Duomenų nuoseklumas90/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. There are no detected disputes or suspensions. The primary inconsistency lies in the conflicting information regarding the procurement procedure type ('Procedure: A' vs. 'Negotiation Allowed').

Inconsistency between 'Procedure: A' (Open procedure) and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic.
Tvarumas50/100

The tender does not explicitly include green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While this is common for IT license procurement, it represents a missed opportunity to integrate broader sustainability goals.

Absence of explicit green, social, or innovation criteria.

Privalumai

Clear financial information and objective lowest price evaluation criterion.
Allowance for equivalent products, promoting competition and fairness.
Comprehensive set of tender documents provided.
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled.
Clear contract duration and start date.

Problemos

Inconsistency between 'Procedure: A' (Open procedure) and 'Negotiation Allowed' characteristic.
The technical description allows for ordering unlisted, functionally compatible products, which could lead to scope ambiguity.
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria.

Rekomendacijos

1. Clarify the exact procurement procedure type, resolving the inconsistency between 'Open Procedure' and 'Negotiation Allowed' to ensure legal compliance and bidder understanding.
2. Refine the technical description to better define the scope for potentially unlisted products, or provide a clearer framework for their inclusion, to enhance completeness and reduce ambiguity.
3. Consider integrating relevant sustainability, social, or innovation criteria, even for IT procurement, to align with modern public procurement best practices.

AI įvertinimo peržiūra

Prisiregistruokite, kad peržiūrėtumėte visus reikalavimus ir analizę

Išsami kokybės balo analizė
Detali sub-balų analizė
Privalumų ir trūkumų įžvalgos
Strateginės rekomendacijos

Nereikia kreditinės kortelės • Sąranka per 2 minutes

Įtraukti į „Pipeline“