Zakup usług monitorowania, utrzymania i modyfikacji systemu zarządzania dokumentami

This tender for document management system services is generally well-structured, with a good number of supporting documents. However, the absence of disclosed estimated value and explicit evaluation criteria are notable shortcomings.

The tender adheres to open procedure and specifies a CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the organization is a public authority. The absence of disclosed disputes and regulatory compliance is assumed positive. The primary concern is the lack of a 'reveal date' for bids, which is unusual for an open procedure.

The title and description are clear, and the CPV code is provided. A significant number of documents are attached, suggesting detailed requirements are available within them. However, the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria within the main tender notice reduces overall clarity.

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, deadlines, and contract duration. A substantial number of documents (19) are provided, indicating comprehensive documentation is available. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission.

The tender is an open procedure, and e-procurement is indicated, promoting accessibility. The value is not disclosed, which can impact fairness. No specific requirements tailored to individual companies are apparent, suggesting a reasonable level of fairness. Full document access is implied by the number of attached documents.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is positive. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, but the duration is given. Financing information is not detailed. The deadline, while specified, might be considered short given the number of documents to review and the complexity of the service.

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The status is 'active', and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logical, with the opening date following the submission deadline.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.