Partner ds. Realizacji Programu Społecznościowych ds. Wielosystemowej Redukcji Przemocy (Vanguard)

This tender is generally well-structured with clear financial limits and a defined scope, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed technical requirements, impacting its overall completeness and fairness.

The tender adheres to the Procurement Act 2023 and specifies an open procedure under a light touch regime. Deadlines are provided, and the CPV code is present. No disputes are indicated. The primary concern is the lack of specified evaluation criteria, which could indirectly affect the procedural fairness and legal defensibility of the award process.

The description of the service required is clear, and the financial cap is explicitly stated. The contract duration and start date are also defined. However, the absence of detailed technical capability requirements leaves some ambiguity regarding the specific expertise expected from bidders.

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the lack of available document content and the absence of specified evaluation criteria mean that crucial details for bidders to fully understand the requirements and assessment process are missing.

The tender is an open competition, and the maximum budget is clearly disclosed, preventing bids from exceeding it. The criteria for exclusion based on budget are objective. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed, potentially impacting perceived fairness.

The contract start date and duration are provided. Financing information is implicitly linked to the stated budget. However, the tender does not specify an e-submission portal, and the availability of document content is not confirmed, which could hinder practical submission.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The contract start and end dates align with the specified duration.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender documentation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.