Ønsker du å legge inn bud på offentlige anbud? Se vår TaaS-tjeneste for anbudsklargjøring
Anbud

Connection to M. Härma tn 21 and 23/25 in Raadi alev, Tartu vald, Tartu maakond (LC4358, IP8414)

Lukket

Fristen for innlevering er utløpt

Fristen for innlevering av dette anbudet er utløpt og aksepterer ikke lenger søknader. Informasjonen nedenfor beholdes for referanseformål.

Se aktive anbud
Frist
Utløpt
februar 27, 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Bygg og anlegg
Referanse
306352
Verdi
€35,100
Sted
Estonia, Estland
Publisert
februar 16, 2026
Organisasjon
CPV-kode
Evalueringskriterier
Total bid cost100%
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

februar 16, 2026

Frist for spørsmål

februar 20, 2026

Frist for innlevering

februar 27, 2026

Anbudsåpning

februar 27, 2026

Kontraktens startdato

mars 09, 2026

VinnersjansePRO
🔒
Oppgrader til Professional
Se din estimerte vinnersjanse basert på historiske data.
Oppgrader til Professional →
KjøperinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp kjøperinnsikt
Se forbruksmønstre, foretrukne prosedyrer og mer.
Oppgrader til Professional →
SektorinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp sektorinnsikt
Se gjennomsnittlige vinnerpriser, konkurransenivåer og markedstrender.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Budsjett
€35,100
Varighet
Ikke spesifisert
Sted
Estonia
Type
Bygg og anlegg
70
Kvalitetsscore/100
God
Markedsbenchmark
Gj.snittlig vinnerpris
€524,963
Gj.snittlig antall tilbud
4.7
Konkurranse
Medium
SMB-vinnere
94%
5,932 analyserte anbud

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

Tender announced for connection to M. Härma tn 21 and 23/25 in Raadi alev, Tartu vald, Tartu maakond (LC4358, IP8414). Construct according to the renovation project. The deadline for completion of works is 03.07.2026; -transformer by the contracting authority. Located at Tristock Keila warehouse Keki 5 warehouse -substation by the contracting authority. Handover June 2026. - Ground cable 3x240+35cU, 24kV by the contracting authority. Cable is on order. - meters by the contracting authority. Notify of the need two weeks in advance. Transport of equipment and materials procured by the contracting authority and associated costs from the supplier's delivery partner to the site are included in the scope of the contractor's work. If possible and necessary, the contract may be concluded and the commencement of works/ordering of services may begin before the estimated start date of the contract validity published in the general information about the tender. If the tender procedure takes longer than this, the contract may be concluded and its execution may begin even after the estimated start date of the contract validity published in the general information. The deadline for completion of works will not change.
EU-finansiertElektronisk innlevering

Kjør risikoanalyse

Identifiser potensielle risikoer, inkonsekvenser og varsellamper i alle anbudsunderlag. Få en detaljert risikorapport med alvorlighetsgrader og anbefalinger for risikoreduserende tiltak.

Logg inn

Vinnstrategi

AI-drevet analyse av dette anbudets krav, muligheter og utfordringer. Få strategiske innsikter for å maksimere vinnersjansene dine.

75%
Estimert vinnersjanseModerat match

This tender is a straightforward electrical installation project with a strong emphasis on cost. Success hinges on a highly competitive price, meticulous adherence to technical requirements, and efficient project management to meet the tight deadline. Demonstrating a proven track record in similar projects and a clear understanding of the site and scope are crucial for securing this contract.

Viktigste vinnermeldinger

Cost-Effective Excellence: Delivering high-quality electrical installation services at the most competitive price.

Reliable Execution: Proven expertise and a dedicated team ensuring timely and compliant project completion.

Seamless Integration: Efficient management of all project phases, including the integration of supplier-provided materials.

Sentrale muligheter
The tender explicitly states that the bid will be evaluated solely on total cost (100% weight), with the lowest price receiving the maximum score. This presents a significant opportunity for cost-conscious bidders.
The possibility to commence work before the official contract start date allows for proactive project initiation and potentially earlier completion, demonstrating agility and commitment.
The tender clearly defines the scope of work and specifies which materials (transformer, substation, cable, meters) are provided by the contracting authority, simplifying the bidder's material procurement planning.
Sentrale utfordringer
The extremely tight deadline for work completion (03.07.2026) requires meticulous planning and execution to avoid delays, especially considering potential procurement lead times for materials not supplied by the contracting authority.

Develop a detailed project schedule with buffer times, proactively communicate with suppliers for any non-provided materials, and ensure efficient on-site logistics and resource allocation from the outset.

The lack of specified evaluation criteria beyond price (100%) means that any deviation from technical requirements or perceived lack of experience could lead to disqualification, even with a low price.

Thoroughly review all tender documents (Projekt_LC4358_IP8414, Väikehanke alusdokumendid 02.01.2026, Lisatingimused_LC4358_IP8414) to ensure 100% compliance with all technical and procedural requirements. Clearly articulate how all mandatory requirements will be met in the bid.

The tender states 'GREEN PROCUREMENT: No' and 'SOCIAL ASPECTS: No', indicating these are not evaluation factors. However, ignoring potential sustainable practices or local employment could be a missed opportunity if competitors subtly incorporate them.

While not explicitly evaluated, consider incorporating minor, cost-neutral sustainability elements (e.g., waste reduction) or highlighting local workforce utilization as a demonstration of good practice, without adding significant cost.

Ideell leverandørprofil
A small to medium-sized electrical contracting company with a strong local presence in Tartu County, possessing a proven track record of successfully completing electrical construction projects within budget and on time. They should have a dedicated team with the necessary switching rights and operational expertise, and a robust cost management system to offer a highly competitive price.
Sentrale krav
Demonstrate successful completion of at least three electrical construction contracts within the last 60 months, with at least one valued at €40,000 (excluding VAT) or more.
Provide personnel with switching rights and personnel responsible for the work operation.
Submit a cost table detailing all project expenses.
Familiarization with the site is required.
Document and hand over the performed works.
Viktigste differensiatorer
A highly optimized and transparent cost structure that clearly demonstrates value for money.
A proactive and detailed project execution plan that addresses potential risks and timelines effectively.
Demonstrated experience with similar scale electrical infrastructure projects and a clear understanding of Elektrilevi OÜ's operational standards.
Muligheter for samfunnsverdi
While not a formal evaluation criterion, a bidder could subtly mention the use of local skilled labor from the Tartu region, contributing to the local economy and demonstrating community engagement.
Fokusområder for anbud
Total Cost100%

Conduct a thorough cost analysis, factoring in all direct and indirect costs. Identify areas for efficiency gains and present a highly competitive, yet profitable, price. Ensure the cost table is clear, comprehensive, and directly addresses all line items implied by the project scope.

Anbefalinger6
Meticulously Document Past Performance
KritiskMiddels arbeid

Ensure the list of three completed electrical construction contracts is comprehensive, clearly detailing the scope, value (excl. VAT), and completion date for each. Highlight the contract valued at €40,000 or more, providing specific details that align with the current tender's complexity.

Directly meets a mandatory eligibility requirement, preventing disqualification.
Aggressively Price for Lowest Cost
KritiskMye arbeid

Given the 100% cost weighting, conduct a granular cost breakdown. Seek efficiencies in labor, logistics, and any non-provided materials. Aim to be the lowest bidder while ensuring profitability and quality standards are maintained.

Maximizes score for the sole evaluation criterion, significantly increasing win probability.
Conduct Thorough Site Familiarization
HøyMiddels arbeid

Visit the M. Härma tn 21 and 23/25 site. Document site conditions, access points, and any potential logistical challenges. This understanding should inform the project plan and costings, and can be referenced in the bid to demonstrate due diligence.

Reduces risk of unforeseen costs and delays, demonstrates commitment, and can be a subtle differentiator.
Confirm Personnel Qualifications
HøyMiddels arbeid

Ensure all proposed personnel have the necessary switching rights and that the designated responsible person for work operation is clearly identified and qualified. Prepare documentation to prove these qualifications.

Meets a critical technical capability requirement, essential for project execution and safety.
Proactive Material & Logistics Planning
HøyMiddels arbeid

While key components are provided, understand the lead times for any other necessary materials. Plan the logistics for transporting the provided materials from Keila to the site efficiently, factoring this into the cost and schedule.

Minimizes risk of delays due to material availability or transport issues, ensuring adherence to the tight deadline.
Detailed Project Execution Plan
MediumMiddels arbeid

Beyond just a schedule, provide a concise plan outlining key phases, responsibilities, communication protocols, and quality assurance measures. This demonstrates a professional approach and preparedness.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to execute the project effectively, even if not explicitly evaluated.
Konkurranseposisjonering
Position the bid as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on quality or compliance. Emphasize the bidder's proven ability to deliver similar projects on time and within budget, leveraging their local presence and efficient operational model.

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

9 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (3)
Obligatorisk (1)
Overholdelse (1)
Teknisk (3)
Finansiell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--The bid must include a cost table.
--Familiarization with the site is required.
--The tenderer must submit a list of at least three successfully completed electrical construction contracts from the last 60 months, including at least one valued at €40,000 (excluding VAT) or more.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Mandatory and voluntary exclusion grounds are described in the tender documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The tenderer must demonstrate legal representation rights.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The tenderer must have successfully completed at least three electrical construction contracts within the last 60 months, with at least one contract valued at €40,000 (excluding VAT) or more.
--The tenderer must provide personnel with switching rights and personnel responsible for the work operation.
--The tenderer must document and hand over the performed works.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid will be evaluated solely on total cost (100% weight), with the lowest price receiving the maximum score.

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

8 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

VastavustingimusedPDF
306352_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 9.8 KB

This document outlines the conditions for tender submission, including requirements for the tender cost table, personnel with switching rights and designated responsibility for work operations, and representation rights.

Vis
Maksumuse_tabel_IP8414_LC4358XLS
Maksumuse_tabel_IP8414_LC4358.xls -- 9.0 KB

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
Varasemate hankelepingute informatsioonDOC
Varasemate hankelepingute informatsioon.docx -- 22.3 KB

Bidders must submit a list of at least three electricity construction contracts successfully completed within the last 60 months, with at least one contract valued at 40,000 EUR (excl. VAT) or more, to demonstrate their qualification.

Vis
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
306352_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 2.8 KB

This document specifies that the tender will be evaluated solely based on the total cost of the offer (100% weight), with the lowest price receiving the maximum points.

Vis
Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
306352_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 7.1 KB

This document outlines mandatory and voluntary exclusion grounds and sets qualification conditions, requiring bidders to have successfully completed at least three similar electrical construction contracts within the last 60 months.

Vis
Lisatingimused_LC4358_IP8414DOC
Lisatingimused_LC4358_IP8414.docx -- 17.1 KB

This document outlines additional conditions and requirements for the electrical installation works at M. Härma tn 21 and 23/25 in Tartu rural municipality, including site visits, communication, work documentation, and handover procedures.

Vis
Projekt_LC4358_IP8414ZIP
Projekt_LC4358_IP8414.zip -- 34.2 MB

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis
Väikehanke alusdokumendid 02.01.2026ZIP
Väikehanke alusdokumendid (02012026).zip -- 2.3 MB

Ingen sammendrag tilgjengelig for dette dokumentet.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

70
God

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for electrical installation work is generally well-structured with clear project details and electronic submission, but suffers from a critical contradiction regarding evaluation criteria and some document accessibility issues for automated analysis.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar75/100

Deadlines are reasonable, CPV code is appropriate, and the procedure type is defined by codes. The tender is EU Funded, suggesting adherence to broader regulations. However, the direct contradiction between 'relative_weighting' and '100% total cost' for evaluation criteria is a significant legal ambiguity that could lead to challenges. The 'Value Classified: Yes' alongside a disclosed value is a minor inconsistency.

Contradiction in evaluation criteria (relative_weighting vs. 100% cost)
'Value Classified: Yes' despite disclosed value
Klarhet65/100

The project description and performance conditions are generally clear, with external links provided for detailed requirements. AI-extracted requirements are specific. However, the fundamental contradiction in evaluation criteria severely impacts clarity for potential bidders. The inability to analyze critical documents like the project plan and cost table also limits the assessment of overall clarity.

Contradiction in evaluation criteria
Inability to analyze critical documents (project plan, cost table) due to unsupported formats
Fullstendighet70/100

Basic information, deadlines, value, and duration are all specified. Requirements and criteria are defined, though with the noted inconsistency. All 8 documents are listed as attached, which is good. However, the fact that 3 crucial documents (project plan, additional conditions, cost table) are in unsupported formats (.zip, .xls) means their content could not be processed, leaving significant gaps in the analyzable completeness of the tender details.

Critical documents (project plan, cost table) are in unsupported formats, preventing content analysis
Rettferdighet80/100

Full document access is indicated, the value is disclosed, and deadlines are reasonable. E-procurement is enabled, promoting equal access. The experience requirements are specific but appear generic enough to not be tailored. The main concern for fairness is the ambiguity in evaluation criteria, which could lead to subjective interpretation or challenges. The 95-day payment term for factoring, while optional, could be a barrier for some smaller businesses.

Contradiction in evaluation criteria impacts transparency
Long payment terms for factoring might disadvantage some bidders
Praktisk gjennomførbarhet75/100

Electronic submission is supported, and a contract start date is known. Financing information is detailed, including payment terms. The duration of the work is specified. The requirement for bidders to transport client-provided materials is a practical detail. The main practical concern for bidders might be the 95-day payment term if they opt for the factoring program, which is quite long.

Potentially long payment terms (95 days) for factoring could impact cash flow for suppliers
Datakonsistens60/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical. However, there are two significant inconsistencies: the evaluation criteria ('relative_weighting' vs. '100% total cost') and the conflicting statements about value classification ('Value Classified: Yes' vs. 'Estimated Value: 35,100.00 EUR'). These undermine the reliability of the tender information.

Contradiction in evaluation criteria
Contradiction in value classification
Bærekraft50/100

The tender is identified as 'EU Funded,' which often correlates with higher standards, including sustainability. However, the automated checks explicitly state 'Not green procurement,' 'No social criteria,' and 'No innovation focus.' Without specific requirements or criteria related to environmental, social, or innovative aspects, the tender does not actively promote sustainability beyond the general implication of EU funding.

Lack of explicit green, social, or innovation criteria

Styrker

Clear project description and scope
Detailed payment terms provided
Electronic submission and e-procurement enabled
Specific experience requirements for technical capability
EU Funded

Bekymringer

Critical contradiction in evaluation criteria
Inability to analyze key documents (project plan, cost table)
Conflicting statements on value classification
Long payment terms (95 days) if using factoring program
Lack of explicit sustainability, social, or innovation criteria

Anbefalinger

1. Clarify the evaluation criteria immediately to resolve the contradiction between 'relative_weighting' and '100% total cost'.
2. Ensure all tender documents, especially critical ones like project plans and cost tables, are provided in universally accessible and machine-readable formats.
3. Review the payment terms, particularly the 95-day factoring option, to ensure it does not unduly disadvantage potential bidders.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

Legg til i pipeline