Trenger du hjelp fra en anbudsekspert? Se vår anbudsforberedelsestjeneste
Anbud

Grapevine Variety Breeding Research

Lukket

Fristen for innlevering er utløpt

Fristen for innlevering av dette anbudet er utløpt og aksepterer ikke lenger søknader. Informasjonen nedenfor beholdes for referanseformål.

Se aktive anbud
Frist
Utløpt
20. februar 2026
Kontraktsdetaljer
Kategori
Tjenester
Referanse
305862
Verdi
€49,660
Sted
Estonia, Estland
Publisert
6. februar 2026
CPV-kode
Evalueringskriterier
Bid Cost45%
Bidder's vision and methodology45%
Inclusion of a horticultural science student10%
Prosjektets tidslinje

Anbud publisert

6. februar 2026

Frist for spørsmål

13. februar 2026

Frist for innlevering

20. februar 2026

Anbudsåpning

20. februar 2026

VinnersjansePRO
🔒
Oppgrader til Professional
Se din estimerte vinnersjanse basert på historiske data.
Oppgrader til Professional →
SektorinnsiktPRO
🔒
Lås opp sektorinnsikt
Se gjennomsnittlige vinnerpriser, konkurransenivåer og markedstrender.
Oppgrader til Professional →
Vis original
Budsjett
€49,660
Varighet
39 måneder
Sted
Estonia
Type
Tjenester
82
Kvalitetsscore/100
Utmerket
Markedsbenchmark
Gj.snittlig vinnerpris
€40,919
Gj.snittlig antall tilbud
1.9
Konkurranse
Lav
SMB-vinnere
95%
495 analyserte anbud

Opprinnelig anbudsbeskrivelse

The aim of the research is to carry out the first stage of grapevine variety breeding in Estonia. The research contributes to activity 5.3 "Shaping variety breeding and propagation material policy" of the activity-based state budget food safety program 2025-2028.
Elektronisk innlevering

Kjør risikoanalyse

Identifiser potensielle risikoer, inkonsekvenser og varsellamper i alle anbudsunderlag. Få en detaljert risikorapport med alvorlighetsgrader og anbefalinger for risikoreduserende tiltak.

Logg inn

Vinnstrategi

Få en AI-drevet vinnerstrategi skreddersydd for dette anbudet. Inkluderer sannsynlighetsscore for å vinne, viktige muligheter og utfordringer, anbefalte fokusområder for tilbudet, innsikt i konkurranseposisjonering og handlingsrettede anbefalinger for å maksimere sjansene dine.

Logg inn

Konkurrenter

Oppgrader for å se hvilke selskaper som sannsynligvis vil legge inn tilbud på dette anbudet, basert på historiske anskaffelsesdata.

Logg inn

Krav og kvalifikasjoner

20 krav på tvers av 5 kategorier

Innlevering (9)
Obligatorisk (2)
Overholdelse (3)
Teknisk (5)
Finansiell (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS9
--The bid must be submitted electronically.
--Parts considered business secrets must be clearly marked in the bid.
--Compliance of the bid with the conditions must be confirmed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS2
--The bidder must not have grounds for exclusion as stipulated in RHS § 95 lg 1.
--The bidder must not be located in Russia or Belarus.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--The bidder must prove horticultural science experience from the last 36 months with a list of significant works.
--In case of a joint bid, a power of attorney must be submitted.
--The bid must comply with the conditions set out in the procurement documents and this compliance must be confirmed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--A work methodology must be submitted.
--An activity and timeline schedule must be submitted.
--A list of team members must be submitted.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The bid cost will be evaluated as a criterion (45% weighting).

Forhåndsvisning av krav

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Dokumenter

4 dokumenter tilgjengelig med AI-sammendrag

VastavustingimusedPDF
305862_vastavustingimused.pdf -- 7.1 KB

This document outlines tender submission conditions, including requirements for joint tenderers' power of attorney, business secret declaration, confirmation of tender compliance, and mandates the submission of the bidder's work methodology, activity and timetable, team member list, and their previous experience.

Vis
Hindamiskriteeriumid ja hinnatavad näitajadPDF
305862_hindamiskriteeriumid.pdf -- 5.0 KB

This document outlines the evaluation criteria for the grapevine breeding research tender, focusing on the total cost (45%), the bidder's vision and methodology (45%), and the inclusion of a horticulture student in the team (10%).

Vis
Kõrvaldamise alused ja kvalifitseerimistingimusedPDF
305862_korvaldamise_alused_ja_kvalifitseerimi... -- 6.9 KB

This document outlines exclusion grounds (e.g., absence of grounds under RHS § 95 lg 1, no location in Russia/Belarus) and qualification conditions, requiring bidders to demonstrate horticultural science experience from the last 36 months by submitting a list of significant works.

Vis
Hanke alusdokumendidPDF
Riigihanke_alusdokumendid.pdf -- 1.8 MB

This document outlines the conditions for the simplified procurement procedure for grapevine variety breeding research, detailing submission requirements, evaluation criteria (cost, methodology, student involvement), and the electronic submission process.

Vis

Forhåndsvisning av dokumenter

Registrer deg for å se dokumentoppsummeringer og analyser

82
Utmerket

Anbudskvalitetsscore

This tender for grapevine variety breeding research is well-structured and transparent, demonstrating good clarity in its requirements and evaluation criteria, with strong adherence to legal and fairness principles.

Poengfordeling

Juridisk samsvar85/100

The tender clearly defines the procedure type (simplified), uses an appropriate CPV code, and explicitly references national legal exclusion grounds (RHS § 95 lg 1), including the Russia/Belarus restriction. No disputes or suspensions are noted.

Klarhet85/100

The tender description is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements are comprehensive and well-structured, covering all necessary aspects from exclusion to submission. Evaluation criteria are explicitly defined with clear weightings.

•Exact region for research is unspecified, which could lead to minor ambiguity regarding operational location.
Fullstendighet80/100

All essential information, including title, organization, reference, financial details, deadlines, and duration, is provided. Requirements and evaluation criteria are thoroughly defined across the four tender documents.

•The exact geographical region for the research is not specified beyond the NUTS code for Estonia.
Rettferdighet90/100

The tender promotes fairness through disclosed value, electronic submission, and objective, transparent evaluation criteria. Requirements appear generic and not tailored to a specific company, ensuring equal access for qualified bidders.

Praktisk gjennomførbarhet75/100

Electronic submission is supported, and the funding source is identified. The duration is clearly specified. However, the contract start date is not provided, and while documents are implied to be online, a direct URL is not explicitly given.

•Contract start date is not specified.
•Direct document URL is not explicitly provided (though implied by e-procurement).
Datakonsistens90/100

Key fields are consistently populated, and dates are logical and sequential. There are no detected suspensions or disputes. A minor metadata inconsistency exists where 'Value Classified: Yes' is stated, but the estimated value is publicly disclosed.

•Minor metadata inconsistency: 'Value Classified: Yes' while the estimated value is publicly disclosed.
Bærekraft60/100

The tender explicitly includes social criteria by requiring the inclusion of a horticultural science student, which is a positive aspect. However, it lacks explicit green procurement or innovation-focused criteria and is not EU-funded.

•Lack of explicit green procurement criteria.
•No specific innovation focus beyond general research methodology.

Styrker

Clear and comprehensive requirements and evaluation criteria.
Strong legal compliance with national regulations and exclusion grounds.
Transparency through disclosed value and electronic submission.
Inclusion of social criteria (student involvement).
Detailed documentation available.

Bekymringer

Exact geographical region for research is unspecified.
Contract start date is not explicitly provided.
Lack of explicit green procurement or innovation-focused criteria.
Minor metadata inconsistency regarding value classification.

Anbefalinger

1. Specify the exact geographical region or operational area for the research to enhance clarity.
2. Provide an estimated contract start date or a timeframe for contract commencement.
3. Consider integrating explicit green procurement or innovation criteria in future tenders, where applicable.

Forhåndsvisning av AI-score

Registrer deg for å se komplette krav og analyser

Fullstendig analyse av kvalitetsresultat
Detaljert nedbrytning av delresultater
Innsikt i styrker og bekymringer
Strategiske anbefalinger

Ingen kredittkort kreves • Oppsett på 2 minutter

✨Ønsker du at vi håndterer denne anbudskonkurransen?La oss vinne dette anbudet